These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19490409)

  • 1. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and implications for paediatric prescribing.
    Sinha Y; Brien JA; Craig JC
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2009 Jun; 45(6):351-7. PubMed ID: 19490409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Australians able to access new medicines on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme in a more or less timely manner? An analysis of pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee recommendations, 1999-2003.
    Wonder MJ; Neville AM; Parsons R
    Value Health; 2006; 9(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 16903989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delays in access to affordable medicines: putting policy into perspective.
    Pearce A; van Gool K; Haywood P; Haas M
    Aust Health Rev; 2012 Nov; 36(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 23062753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS IN AUSTRALIA.
    Turkstra E; Bettington E; Donohue ML; Mervin MC
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(4):521-528. PubMed ID: 28703092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of PBAC submissions and outcomes for medicines (2010-2018).
    Lybrand S; Wonder M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Jun; 36(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 32524923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based decision-making within Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme.
    Lopert R
    Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Jul; 60():1-13. PubMed ID: 19639714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are cancer drugs less likely to be recommended for listing by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee in Australia?
    Chim L; Kelly PJ; Salkeld G; Stockler MR
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):463-75. PubMed ID: 20465315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicine reimbursement recommendations in Canada, Australia, and Scotland.
    Lexchin J; Mintzes B
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Sep; 14(9):581-8. PubMed ID: 18778173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicines and the media: news reports of medicines recommended for government reimbursement in Australia.
    Robertson J; Walkom EJ; Bevan MD; Newby DA
    BMC Public Health; 2013 May; 13():489. PubMed ID: 23687910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is it all about price? Why requests for government subsidy of anticancer drugs were rejected in Australia.
    Karikios DJ; Chim L; Martin A; Nagrial A; Howard K; Salkeld G; Stockler MR
    Intern Med J; 2017 Apr; 47(4):400-407. PubMed ID: 27928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What impact does 'conventional' economic evaluation have on patient access to new orphan medicines? A comparative study of their reimbursement in Australia (2005-2012).
    Wonder M; Chin G
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015; 15(5):843-50. PubMed ID: 25938794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the Quality of the Clinical Evidence in Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: Fit for Purpose?
    Wonder M; Dunlop S
    Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 26091601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Access to new medicines in New Zealand compared to Australia.
    Wonder M; Milne R
    N Z Med J; 2011 Nov; 124(1346):12-28. PubMed ID: 22143849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee decisions for listing medicines for diabetes and its associated complications.
    Haque MM; Gumbie M; Gu M; Dissanayake G
    Aust Health Rev; 2023 Apr; 47(2):139-147. PubMed ID: 36543249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.
    Clement FM; Harris A; Li JJ; Yong K; Lee KM; Manns BJ
    JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(13):1437-43. PubMed ID: 19809025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the implications of a fixed budget for new medicines: a study of reimbursement of new medicines in Australia and New Zealand.
    Taylor C; Wonder M
    Aust Health Rev; 2015 Sep; 39(4):455-461. PubMed ID: 25751688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of co-payment increases on dispensings of government-subsidised medicines in Australia.
    Hynd A; Roughead EE; Preen DB; Glover J; Bulsara M; Semmens J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Nov; 17(11):1091-9. PubMed ID: 18942671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Australian access to FDA-approved breakthrough therapy designation medicines: a 10-year review.
    Lingaratnam S; Hussainy SY; Murphy A; Perrin C; Samuvel M; Mehrvarz E; Lim CX; Zalcberg J
    J Pharm Policy Pract; 2024; 17(1):2389120. PubMed ID: 39175661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of sponsor hearings on health technology assessment decision making.
    Flowers M; Lybrand S; Wonder M
    Aust Health Rev; 2020 Apr; 44(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 31072455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Key considerations in reimbursement decision-making for multiple sclerosis drugs in Australia.
    Phan YHL; De Abreu Lourenco R; Haas M; van der Linden N
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2018 Oct; 25():144-149. PubMed ID: 30077086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.