169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1949049)
1. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay.
Maurer T; Kimber I
Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytokine endpoints for the local lymph node assay: consideration of interferon-gamma and interleukin 12.
Dearman RJ; Hilton J; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 10362264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Gray TJ; Waite SJ
Toxicol Lett; 1991 Feb; 55(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 1998208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Arch Toxicol; 1993; 67(9):629-36. PubMed ID: 8311690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anamnestic responses to contact allergens: application in the murine local lymph node assay.
Kimber I; Weisenberger C
J Appl Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 11(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 2061551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Assay development and results of an initial validation study.
Kimber I; Weisenberger C
Arch Toxicol; 1989; 63(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 2788401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity.
Lappin MB; Dearman RJ; Norval M; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation of interleukin 6 (IL-6) production by draining lymph node cells.
Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Ramdin LS; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1994; 14(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 7963242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: a preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Weisenberger C
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Oct; 21(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 2598647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for the assessment of sensitizing potentials of chemical compounds.
Kashima R; Okada J; Ikeda Y
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):831-6. PubMed ID: 7927080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved ex vivo/in vitro lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for a screening test of contact hypersensitivity of chemical compounds.
Kashima R; Oyake Y; Okada J; Ikeda Y
Toxicology; 1996 Nov; 114(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 8931760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of auricular lymph node cell proliferation in isothiazolone-treated mice.
Potter DW; Hazelton GA
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1995 Feb; 24(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 7737428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: comparisons with the Buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA
J Appl Toxicol; 1990 Jun; 10(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 2380478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a flow cytometry assay for the identification and differentiation of chemicals with the potential to elicit irritation, IgE-mediated, or T cell-mediated hypersensitivity responses.
Manetz TS; Meade BJ
Toxicol Sci; 1999 Apr; 48(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 10353312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an ex vivo murine local lymph node assay: multiple endpoint comparison.
Piccotti JR; Knight SA; Gillhouse K; Lagattuta MS; Bleavins MR
J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 16705757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neuropeptide denervation alters both the elicitation and induction phases of contact hypersensitivity in mice.
Veronesi B; Williams WC; Smialowicz RJ; Sailstad DM; Doerfler D; Selgrade MJ
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1998 Dec; 153(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 9878594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.
Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
