BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19491050)

  • 1. Growth and profitability in small privately held biotech firms: preliminary findings.
    Brännback M; Carsrud A; Renko M; Ostermark R; Aaltonen J; Kiviluoto N
    N Biotechnol; 2009 Jun; 25(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 19491050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Private biotech 2004--the numbers.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jun; 24(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 16763589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lack of private financing hobbles emerging biotech regions.
    Jia H; Jayarama KS; Astvatsaturyan M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jan; 24(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 16404378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An empirical investigation of hospital profitability in the post-PPS era.
    Younis M; Rice J; Barkoulas J
    J Health Care Finance; 2001; 28(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 11794758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IPOs: the narrow window closes?
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1489. PubMed ID: 15583641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cash-strapped biotechs find financing alternative.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1057-8. PubMed ID: 15340452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shift toward early-stage deals favors biotechs.
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jan; 24(1):6. PubMed ID: 16404377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Another clue to biotech value.
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):746. PubMed ID: 12833091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public biotech 2007--the numbers.
    Lawrence S; Lähteenmäki R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jul; 26(7):753-62. PubMed ID: 18612294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Napster case spills into biotech sector.
    Bouchie A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1185-6. PubMed ID: 15384189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public biotechnology 2003-the numbers.
    Lähteenmäki R; Baker M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 15175683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hedge funds gain edge by doubling biotech investments.
    Ransom J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Apr; 24(4):373-4. PubMed ID: 16601707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. My worst biotech investment.
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Apr; 24(4):401. PubMed ID: 16601718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A special biotech speculation.
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jun; 24(6):622. PubMed ID: 16763586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biotech holds steady in Q4.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 14755275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beware the biotech barker.
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 May; 23(5):538. PubMed ID: 15877065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biotech IPOs: handle with care.
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1437. PubMed ID: 14647322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biotech IPOs--flop or pop?
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Aug; 22(8):949. PubMed ID: 15286641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chasing biotech, state by state--winners and losers.
    Wilan KH
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 23(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 15696143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A taxing dilemma.
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Oct; 23(10):1219. PubMed ID: 16211056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.