These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19492636)

  • 41. Retrospective assessment of dental implant-related perforations of relevant anatomical structures and inadequate spacing between implants/teeth using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos N; Mancini AXM; Oliveira ML; Oliveira-Santos C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Sep; 24(9):3281-3288. PubMed ID: 31960132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Multi-planar and cross-sectional oblique scanning (CT) in implant surgery.
    Lownie JF; Lownie MA; Payne AG; Skinstad TN
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1997 Apr; 52(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 9461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Presurgical planning in implant restorations: correct interpretation of cone-beam computed tomography for improved imaging.
    Kourtis S; Skondra E; Roussou I; Skondras EV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Oct; 24(5):321-32. PubMed ID: 23025315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks.
    Lofthag-Hansen S; Gröndahl K; Ekestubbe A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 18783419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Work in progress.
    Rothman SL; Chaftez N; Rhodes ML; Schwarz MS
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 3380955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical applications of digital 2-D and 3-D radiography for the periodontist.
    Eshraghi T; McAllister N; McAllister B
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):36-45. PubMed ID: 23040338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Three-dimensional CT scan analysis for implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Gogarnoiu D; Cavanaugh RR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Sep; 20(9):855-60, 862, 864 passim; quiz 868. PubMed ID: 10649955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Inferior alveolar canal course: a radiographic study.
    Liu T; Xia B; Gu Z
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1212-8. PubMed ID: 19719735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):561-95. PubMed ID: 24993924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research.
    Bornstein MM; Horner K; Jacobs R
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):51-72. PubMed ID: 28000270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Diagnostic value of dental implants in the posterior maxilla using cone beam computed tomography].
    Fan LF; Pan XG; Pu YP; Lai HC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 18989602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [A new modality for dentomaxillofacial imaging: cone beam CT].
    Hauret L; Hodez C
    J Radiol; 2009 May; 90(5 Pt 2):604-17. PubMed ID: 19503057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study.
    Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Yüksel SP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography.
    Aranyarachkul P; Caruso J; Gantes B; Schulz E; Riggs M; Dus I; Yamada JM; Crigger M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):416-24. PubMed ID: 15973953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Use of cone-beam volumetric tomography in the diagnosis of root fractures.
    Bernardes RA; de Moraes IG; Húngaro Duarte MA; Azevedo BC; de Azevedo JR; Bramante CM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 19272806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology.
    Duttenhoefer F; Mertens ME; Vizkelety J; Gremse F; Stadelmann VA; Sauerbier S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1195-202. PubMed ID: 24893967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography for planning dental implant therapy.
    Luk LC; Pow EH; Li TK; Chow TW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 21365040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.