These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19492642)

  • 41. Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial.
    Siciliano VI; Salvi GE; Matarasso S; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 19281503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged implants (Camlog) with different machined collar lengths: a histomorphometric pilot study in dogs.
    Schwarz F; Herten M; Bieling K; Becker J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 18548932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Platelet-rich plasma may not provide any additional effect when associated with guided bone regeneration around dental implants in dogs.
    de Vasconcelos Gurgel BC; Gonçalves PF; Pimentel SP; Ambrosano GM; Nociti Júnior FH; Sallum EA; Casati MZ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 17877464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Study on alveolar ridge augment through technique combination of implant-retented titanium lattice with decalcified dental matrix implanting].
    Xie Y; Liu B; Cen Y; Li Z; Dong G
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 22(4):476-80. PubMed ID: 18575453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Histomorphologic and histomorphometric evaluation of various endosseous implant healing chamber configurations at early implantation times: a study in dogs.
    Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Gil JN; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):577-83. PubMed ID: 20105196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation.
    Araújo MG; Wennström JL; Lindhe J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 17092217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Osteogenic potential of effective bone engineering using dental pulp stem cells, bone marrow stem cells, and periosteal cells for osseointegration of dental implants.
    Ito K; Yamada Y; Nakamura S; Ueda M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 22010075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants.
    Haas R; Baron M; Zechner W; Mailath-Pokorny G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):691-6. PubMed ID: 14579957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Osseointegration of titanium implants following guided bone regeneration using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers.
    Fiorellini JP; Kim DM; Nakajima Y; Weber HP
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Jun; 27(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17694952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of Simvastatin on bone healing around titanium implants in osteoporotic rats.
    Du Z; Chen J; Yan F; Xiao Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 19077150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Stability of the miniscrew implant during healing period].
    Wu J; Bai YX; Wang BK; Gao XH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 41(4):226-7. PubMed ID: 16784589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog.
    Araújo MG; Sukekava F; Wennström JL; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 32(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 15882225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Immediate implant placement into infected and noninfected extraction sockets: a pilot study.
    Chang SW; Shin SY; Hong JR; Yang SM; Yoo HM; Park DS; Oh TS; Kye SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 18755614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
    Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of implant bed preparation using an Er:YAG laser on the osseointegration of titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs.
    Schwarz F; Olivier W; Herten M; Sager M; Chaker A; Becker J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 34(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 17371565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Efficacy of a bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate) in the maintenance of alveolar ridges and in osseointegration of titanium implants.
    Roriz VM; Rosa AL; Peitl O; Zanotto ED; Panzeri H; de Oliveira PT
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 19912271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of force, timing, and location on bone-to-implant contact of miniscrew implants.
    Woods PW; Buschang PH; Owens SE; Rossouw PE; Opperman LA
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 19073958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of microcapsules containing TAK-778 on bone formation around osseointegrated implants: histomorphometric analysis in dogs.
    Rosa AL; de Oliveira CS; Beloti MM; Xavier SP; de Oliveira PT
    Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 16569968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of presence or absence of teeth adjacent to implants installed immediately into extraction sockets on peri-implant hard tissue levels: an experimental study in the dog.
    Favero G; Botticelli D; Rea M; Pantani F; León IG; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Mar; 24(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 22909080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
    Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.