These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19492645)

  • 1. Stability of loaded and unloaded implants with different surfaces.
    Nergiz I; Arpak N; Bostanci H; Scorziello TM; Schmage P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 19492645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
    Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
    Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
    Novaes AB; Souza SL; de Oliveira PT; Souza AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
    Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six-month performance of implants with oxidized and machined surfaces restored at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postimplantation in adult beagle dogs.
    Knobloch L; Larsen PA; Rashid B; Carr AB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15214218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histomorphometric evaluation of six dental implant surfaces after early loading in augmented human sinuses.
    Todisco M; Trisi P
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 17009559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs: follow-up of implant stability and implant failures.
    Nkenke E; Lehner B; Fenner M; Roman FS; Thams U; Neukam FW; Radespiel-Tröger M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 15747672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal torque of immediately loaded transitional endosseous implants in human subjects.
    Simon H; Caputo AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 12507244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reverse-torque failure of screw-shaped implants in baboons after 6 months of healing.
    Carr AB; Beals DW; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 9337019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating.
    Fuming H; Guoli Y; Xiaoxiang W; Shifang Z
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):754-65. PubMed ID: 18466279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
    Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
    Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in nonviable bovine femoral bone.
    Dilek O; Tezulas E; Dincel M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e20-7. PubMed ID: 18230373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone-implant interface around titanium implants under different loading conditions: a histomorphometrical analysis in the Macaca fascicularis monkey.
    Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Wicht H; Yacoob H; Nentwig GH
    J Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 74(10):1483-90. PubMed ID: 14653395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons.
    Watzak G; Zechner W; Ulm C; Tangl S; Tepper G; Watzek G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 16117764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
    Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.
    Chacon GE; Stine EA; Larsen PE; Beck FM; McGlumphy EA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years.
    Nelson K; Semper W; Hildebrand D; Ozyuvaci H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):726-32. PubMed ID: 18807571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.