These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1949268)
1. [Intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor semen. A comparative study]. Westergaard LG Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Sep; 153(38):2621-3. PubMed ID: 1949268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study. Kop PA; van Wely M; Mol BW; de Melker AA; Janssens PM; Arends B; Curfs MH; Kortman M; Nap A; Rijnders E; Roovers JP; Ruis H; Simons AH; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 25637621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Intrauterine insemination with donor semen. Treatment of involuntary childlessness caused by male infertility]. Vilsbøll T; Helmsøe-Zinck L; Andersen AN Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Aug; 156(34):4826-9. PubMed ID: 7992417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Therapeutic donor insemination with frozen semen. Scott SG; Mortimer D; Taylor PJ; Leader A; Pattinson HA CMAJ; 1990 Aug; 143(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 2383847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a single intrauterine insemination of defrosted cryopreserved sperm for therapeutic donor insemination. Rose BI Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1994; 39(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 7920749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial insemination with donor cryopreserved semen: importance of the volume of semen and influence of ovulatory dysfunctions. Painvain E; Barlese MG; Sanna F Acta Eur Fertil; 1989; 20(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2800934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Donor sperm insemination cycles: are two inseminations better than one? Chavkin DE; Molinaro TA; Roe AH; Sammel MD; Dokras A J Androl; 2012; 33(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 21636733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-day IUI treatment cycles are more successful than one-day IUI cycles when using frozen-thawed donor sperm. Matilsky M; Geslevich Y; Ben-Ami M; Ben-Shlomo I; Weiner-Megnagi T; Shalev E J Androl; 1998; 19(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 9796621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of semen and donor factors on the success rate of artificial insemination with frozen semen. Mahadevan MM; Trounson AO; Milne BJ; Leeton JF Clin Reprod Fertil; 1982 Sep; 1(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 6897907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective randomized comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with donor spermatozoa. Wainer R; Merlet F; Ducot B; Bailly M; Tribalat S; Lombroso R Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2919-22. PubMed ID: 8747045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of semen quality scores to predict pregnancy rates in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination with donor sperm. Allamaneni SS; Bandaranayake I; Agarwal A Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82(3):606-11. PubMed ID: 15374703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) parameters and their evolution during preparation as predictors of pregnancy in intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed donor semen cycles. Fréour T; Jean M; Mirallié S; Dubourdieu S; Barrière P Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Apr; 149(2):186-9. PubMed ID: 20074847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of factors related to the recipient and insemination characteristics on the success of artificial insemination with frozen semen. Mahadevan MM; Trounson AO; Milne BJ; Leeton JF Clin Reprod Fertil; 1982 Sep; 1(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 7187266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Efficacy of a program of insemination with cryopreserved semen as treatment of the male factor]. Aranda Gallegos JE; Alvarez Robles L; Barrón Vallejo J; Kably Ambe A Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Dec; 65():520-2. PubMed ID: 9477647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting the success of artificial insemination by frozen donor semen. Wong AW; Ho PC; Kwan M; Ma HK Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2565300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen. Patton PE; Burry KA; Thurmond A; Novy MJ; Wolf DP Fertil Steril; 1992 Mar; 57(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1740198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women. Carroll N; Palmer JR Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11287014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial insemination with fresh donor semen. Hassiakos D; Zourlas PA; Mantzavinos T Int J Fertil; 1990; 35(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 1980665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Optimization of artificial inseminations with donor semen: a four-year experience]. Achard V; Perrin J; Saias-Magnan J; Noizet A; Grillo JM; Paulmyer-Lacroix O Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Nov; 33(11):877-83. PubMed ID: 16243575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The successful use of hyperstimulated washed therapeutic donor insemination after standard therapeutic donor insemination has failed. Dow MP; Jones JM; Dumesic DA; Lu Y; Shapiro SS Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(6):516-21. PubMed ID: 9010745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]