BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19492921)

  • 1. Body mass index, Bishop score, and sonographic measurement of the cervical length as predictors of successful labor induction in twin gestations.
    Park KH; Hong JS; Kang WS; Shin DM; Kim SN
    J Perinat Med; 2009; 37(5):519-23. PubMed ID: 19492921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
    Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Degree of cervical shortening after initial induction of labor as a predictor of subsequent successful induction.
    Kang WS; Park KH; Kim SN; Shin DM; Hong JS; Jung HJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 36(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 20205152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of failed labor induction in parous women at term: role of previous obstetric history, digital examination and sonographic measurement of cervical length.
    Park KH; Hong JS; Shin DM; Kang WS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Apr; 35(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 19708177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
    Gómez-Laencina AM; García CP; Asensio LV; Ponce JA; Martínez MS; Martínez-Vizcaíno V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.
    Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
    Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women.
    Daskalakis G; Thomakos N; Hatziioannou L; Mesogitis S; Papantoniou N; Antsaklis A
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2006; 21(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 16354972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.
    Park KH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery.
    Cubal A; Carvalho J; Ferreira MJ; Rodrigues G; Carmo OD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bishop score and cervical length at 33-35 weeks of gestation and the risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery of twins.
    Park KH; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Ryu A; Oh KJ; Kim SN
    J Perinat Med; 2012 Mar; 40(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 22752769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.