These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19492983)

  • 1. Increase of rejection rate in case-control studies with the differential genotyping error rates.
    Ahn K; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article25. PubMed ID: 19492983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 14748013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the percent increase in minimum sample size for SNP genotyping errors in genetic model-based association studies.
    Kang SJ; Finch SJ; Haynes C; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):139-44. PubMed ID: 15812170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.
    Ahn K; Haynes C; Kim W; Fleur RS; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 17096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error.
    Gordon D; Haynes C; Yang Y; Kramer PL; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 17565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How allele frequency and study design affect association test statistics with misrepresentation errors.
    Escott-Price V; Ghodsi M; Schmidt KM
    Biostatistics; 2014 Apr; 15(2):311-26. PubMed ID: 24178186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying bias due to allele misclassification in case-control studies of haplotypes.
    Govindarajulu US; Spiegelman D; Miller KL; Kraft P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 30(7):590-601. PubMed ID: 16830341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computing asymptotic power and sample size for case-control genetic association studies in the presence of phenotype and/or genotype misclassification errors.
    Ji F; Yang Y; Haynes C; Finch SJ; Gordon D
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article37. PubMed ID: 16646856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of genotyping error on type-I error rate of affected sib pair studies with genotyped parents.
    Seaman SR; Holmans P
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15925894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
    Mayer-Jochimsen M; Fast S; Tintle NL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e56626. PubMed ID: 23472072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating individual error rate into association test of unmatched case-control design.
    Hao K; Wang X
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):154-63. PubMed ID: 15812172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The size of the chi-square test for the Hardy-Weinberg law.
    Kang SH; Shin D
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 15604560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
    Morris RW; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of genotype misclassification errors on the power to detect a gene-environment interaction using cox proportional hazards modeling.
    Tung L; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 17283439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When a case is not a case: effects of phenotype misclassification on power and sample size requirements for the transmission disequilibrium test with affected child trios.
    Buyske S; Yang G; Matise TC; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 19172087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting for differential genotyping error in genetic association analysis.
    Yuan M; Fang H; Zhang H
    J Hum Genet; 2013 Oct; 58(10):657-66. PubMed ID: 23863749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing power for tests of genetic association in the presence of phenotype and/or genotype error by use of double-sampling.
    Gordon D; Yang Y; Haynes C; Finch SJ; Mendell NR; Brown AM; Haroutunian V
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article26. PubMed ID: 16646805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Gordon D; Finch SJ; Nothnagel M; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 2002; 54(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12446984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.