These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19493083)

  • 21. The "therapeutic orgy" and the "right to rot" collide: the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs under state law.
    Blackburn CE
    Houst Law Rev; 1990 May; 27(3):447-513. PubMed ID: 16032811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.
    Goff ML
    Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The competent child's preference in clinical medical decisions: a proposal for its consideration.
    Mark LB
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1983; 11(1):25-58. PubMed ID: 16086470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In re Donald McCarthy.
    Harburg M
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 7960666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The right to refuse treatment: recent Canadian developments.
    Gratzer TG; Matas M
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 7949413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Therapeutic use of conservatorship in the treatment of gravely disabled psychiatric patients.
    Lamb HR; Weinberger LE
    New Dir Ment Health Serv; 2001; (90):91-8. PubMed ID: 11496512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.
    Marshall GS
    Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):167-92. PubMed ID: 16998979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hunger strike among detainees: guidance for good medical practice.
    Gétaz L; Rieder JP; Nyffenegger L; Eytan A; Gaspoz JM; Wolff H
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2012; 142():w13675. PubMed ID: 22987064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Autonomy and the mentally disabled.
    Purtell DJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(4):5. PubMed ID: 10451831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Candor, zeal, and the substitution of judgement: ethics and the mentally ill criminal defendant.
    King JD
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2008 Dec; 58(2):207-66. PubMed ID: 20222213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Schiavo: A hard case makes questionable law.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 15281720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation].
    Thiel A; Röttgers HR
    Psychiatr Prax; 2006 May; 33(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 16680628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
    Brindisi TJ
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ulysses in Minnesota: first steps toward a self-binding psychiatric advance directive statute.
    Cuca R
    Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Sep; 78(6):1152-86. PubMed ID: 10129666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
    Goldmeier KE
    MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do surrogates have a right to refuse pain medications for incompetent patients?
    Blinderman CD
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Feb; 43(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 22248789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Ethics of Court-Mandated Cesarean Sections.
    Glezer A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Sep; 46(3):276-278. PubMed ID: 30368459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic complementarity: Terri's law and separation of powers principles in the end-of-life context.
    Snead OC
    Fla Law Rev; 2005 Jan; 57(1):53-89. PubMed ID: 17153246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.