BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19493184)

  • 1. Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards.
    Ricketts C; Freeman AC; Coombes LR
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 19493184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competence in the musculoskeletal system: assessing the progression of knowledge through an undergraduate medical course.
    Basu S; Roberts C; Newble DI; Snaith M
    Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1253-60. PubMed ID: 15566536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ensuring global standards for medical graduates: a pilot study of international standard-setting.
    Stern DT; Ben-David MF; De Champlain A; Hodges B; Wojtczak A; Schwarz MR
    Med Teach; 2005 May; 27(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 16011943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Description and impact of using a standard-setting method for determining pass/fail scores in a surgery clerkship.
    Schindler N; Corcoran J; DaRosa D
    Am J Surg; 2007 Feb; 193(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 17236857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmarking by cross-institutional comparison of student achievement in a progress test.
    Muijtjens AM; Schuwirth LW; Cohen-Schotanus J; Thoben AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2008 Jan; 42(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 18181848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data.
    Muijtjens AM; Schuwirth LW; Cohen-Schotanus J; van der Vleuten CP
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):593-605. PubMed ID: 17479352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehensive undergraduate medical assessments improve prediction of clinical performance.
    Wilkinson TJ; Frampton CM
    Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 38(10):1111-6. PubMed ID: 15461657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of progress tests.
    McHarg J; Bradley P; Chamberlain S; Ricketts C; Searle J; McLachlan JC
    Med Educ; 2005 Feb; 39(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 15679690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An empirical study of the predictive validity of number grades in medical school using 3 decades of longitudinal data: implications for a grading system.
    Gonnella JS; Erdmann JB; Hojat M
    Med Educ; 2004 Apr; 38(4):425-34. PubMed ID: 15025644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods to assess students' acquisition, application and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum.
    Bierer SB; Dannefer EF; Taylor C; Hall P; Hull AL
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(7):e171-7. PubMed ID: 18777415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model to begin to use clinical outcomes in medical education.
    Haan CK; Edwards FH; Poole B; Godley M; Genuardi FJ; Zenni EA
    Acad Med; 2008 Jun; 83(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 18520464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of medical students in a nontraditional rural clinical program, 1998-99 through 2003-04.
    Schauer RW; Schieve D
    Acad Med; 2006 Jul; 81(7):603-7. PubMed ID: 16799280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standard setting for OSCEs: trial of borderline approach.
    Kilminster S; Roberts T
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 15316271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A model for setting performance standards for standardized patient examinations.
    Talente G; Haist SA; Wilson JF
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Dec; 26(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 14631613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical observed performance evaluation: a prospective study in final year students of surgery.
    Markey GC; Browne K; Hunter K; Hill AD
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 Mar; 16(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 20571858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do baseline data influence standard setting for a clinical skills examination?
    Wayne DB; Barsuk JH; Cohen E; McGaghie WC
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S105-8. PubMed ID: 17895672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing clinical competence at the undergraduate level.
    Newble DI
    Med Educ; 1992 Nov; 26(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 1461169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.
    Bandaranayake RC
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):836-45. PubMed ID: 19117221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the cumulative deviation method for cross-institutional benchmarking in the Berlin progress test.
    Schauber S; Nouns ZM
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 20515375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.