BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2062 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19493597)

  • 1. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of two trunk biomechanical models under symmetric and asymmetric loadings.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 19880122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.
    Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An improved multi-joint EMG-assisted optimization approach to estimate joint and muscle forces in a musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine.
    Gagnon D; Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2011 May; 44(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 21439569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of trunk muscles in generating follower load in the lumbar spine of neutral standing posture.
    Kim K; Kim YH
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Aug; 130(4):041005. PubMed ID: 18601447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seated whole body vibrations with high-magnitude accelerations--relative roles of inertia and muscle forces.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Kasra M
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2639-46. PubMed ID: 18672242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trunk response analysis under sudden forward perturbations using a kinematics-driven model.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1193-200. PubMed ID: 19375707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending.
    Mirka GA; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1396-409. PubMed ID: 8235810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of trunk muscle forces, spinal loads and stability estimated by one stability- and three EMG-assisted optimization approaches.
    Mohammadi Y; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):792-800. PubMed ID: 26117333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 16288897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transient analysis of trunk response in sudden release loading using kinematics-driven finite element model.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 19285367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constraining spine stability levels in an optimization model leads to the prediction of trunk muscle cocontraction and improved spine compression force estimates.
    Brown SH; Potvin JR
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 15713295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spinal stability and role of passive stiffness in dynamic squat and stoop lifts.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Oct; 10(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 17852177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.
    Rohlmann A; Bauer L; Zander T; Bergmann G; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 16549091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trunk biomechanics during maximum isometric axial torque exertions in upright standing.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):969-78. PubMed ID: 18513843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 104.