These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
736 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19494747)
1. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis. Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation. Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique. Mahar AT; Bagheri R; Oka R; Kostial P; Akbarnia BA Spine J; 2008; 8(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 18082463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pedicle screw augmentation with polyethylene tape: a biomechanical study in the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine. Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 20051920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation. van Laar W; Meester RJ; Smit TH; van Royen BJ Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1209-14. PubMed ID: 17203270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation. Biomechanical analysis of supplemental hook fixation. Chiba M; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Moseley TA; Smith TS; Benson DR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 8742203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs. Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine instrumentation. Wang X; Aubin CE; Crandall D; Parent S; Labelle H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(14):E823-35. PubMed ID: 22310096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Cordista A; Conrad B; Horodyski M; Walters S; Rechtine G Spine J; 2006; 6(4):444-9. PubMed ID: 16825053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New rod-plate anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: biomechanical evaluation compared with dual-rod and single-rod with structural interbody support. Zhang H; Johnston CE; Pierce WA; Ashman RB; Bronson DG; Haideri NF Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):E934-40. PubMed ID: 17139209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model. Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a novel technique for surgical repair of spondylolysis in adolescents. Ulibarri JA; Anderson PA; Escarcega T; Mann D; Noonan KJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2067-72. PubMed ID: 16915090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]