217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19494851)
1. Advances and controversies in grading and staging of renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B
Mod Pathol; 2009 Jun; 22 Suppl 2():S24-36. PubMed ID: 19494851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Staging of renal cell carcinoma: current progress and potential advances.
Delahunt B; Eble JN; Samaratunga H; Thunders M; Yaxley JW; Egevad L
Pathology; 2021 Jan; 53(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 33121821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome prediction for renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of prognostic factors for tumours divided according to histological subtype.
Delahunt B; Bethwaite PB; Nacey JN
Pathology; 2007 Oct; 39(5):459-65. PubMed ID: 17886093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma: a Swiss experience with 588 tumors.
Moch H; Gasser T; Amin MB; Torhorst J; Sauter G; Mihatsch MJ
Cancer; 2000 Aug; 89(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 10931460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reassessment of the 1997 TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.
Elmore JM; Kadesky KT; Koeneman KS; Sagalowsky AI
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 14635066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Vancouver classification of renal tumors: Recommendations of the 2012 consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].
Kristiansen G; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Lüders C; Lunkenheimer JM; Gevensleben H; Thiesler T; Montironi R; Egevad L
Pathologe; 2015 May; 36(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 25398389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Papillary (chromophil) renal cell carcinoma: histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 62 cases.
Amin MB; Corless CL; Renshaw AA; Tickoo SK; Kubus J; Schultz DS
Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 Jun; 21(6):621-35. PubMed ID: 9199639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parameters.
Delahunt B; Cheville JC; Martignoni G; Humphrey PA; Magi-Galluzzi C; McKenney J; Egevad L; Algaba F; Moch H; Grignon DJ; Montironi R; Srigley JR;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Oct; 37(10):1490-504. PubMed ID: 24025520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: validation of World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading.
Dagher J; Delahunt B; Rioux-Leclercq N; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Coughlin G; Dunglinson N; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; Malone G; Martin B; Preston J; Pokorny M; Wood S; Yaxley J; Samaratunga H
Histopathology; 2017 Dec; 71(6):918-925. PubMed ID: 28718911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Grading Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evidence for a Four-tiered Classification Incorporating Coagulative Tumor Necrosis.
Avulova S; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Gupta S; Potretzke TA; Tsivian M; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Leibovich BC; Potretzke AM
Eur Urol; 2021 Feb; 79(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 33172723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel grading system for clear cell renal cell carcinoma incorporating tumor necrosis.
Delahunt B; McKenney JK; Lohse CM; Leibovich BC; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Cheville JC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Mar; 37(3):311-22. PubMed ID: 23348209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification and validation of novel prognostic markers in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Rabjerg M
Dan Med J; 2017 Oct; 64(10):. PubMed ID: 28975890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reassessing the current UICC/AJCC TNM staging for renal cell carcinoma.
Moch H; Artibani W; Delahunt B; Ficarra V; Knuechel R; Montorsi F; Patard JJ; Stief CG; Sulser T; Wild PJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Oct; 56(4):636-43. PubMed ID: 19595500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of extensive necrosis in renal cell carcinoma.
Collins J; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2017 Aug; 66():108-114. PubMed ID: 28669641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Architectural Patterns are a Relevant Morphologic Grading System for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Prognosis Assessment: Comparisons With WHO/ISUP Grade and Integrated Staging Systems.
Verine J; Colin D; Nheb M; Prapotnich D; Ploussard G; Cathelineau X; Desgrandchamps F; Mongiat-Artus P; Feugeas JP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Apr; 42(4):423-441. PubMed ID: 29356723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Renal cell carcinoma: pathological prognostic factors, staging and histopathological classification of 355 cases].
Acosta-Jiménez E; Jerónimo-Guerrero D; Macías-Clavijo M; Rivera-Diez D; Hernández-Briseño L; Beltrán-Suárez E; Martínez-Olivares J; Ángeles-Garay U
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2015; 53(4):454-65. PubMed ID: 26177433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
