These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19494953)

  • 1. Static tool influence function for fabrication simulation of hexagonal mirror segments for extremely large telescopes.
    Kim DW; Kim SW
    Opt Express; 2005 Feb; 13(3):910-7. PubMed ID: 19494953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling and validation of polishing tool influence functions for manufacturing segments for an extremely large telescope.
    Li H; Walker D; Yu G; Zhang W
    Appl Opt; 2013 Aug; 52(23):5781-7. PubMed ID: 23938432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified subaperture tool influence functions of a flat-pitch polisher with reverse-calculated material removal rate.
    Dong Z; Cheng H; Tam HY
    Appl Opt; 2014 Apr; 53(11):2455-64. PubMed ID: 24787418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Edge control in CNC polishing, paper 2: simulation and validation of tool influence functions on edges.
    Li H; Walker D; Yu G; Sayle A; Messelink W; Evans R; Beaucamp A
    Opt Express; 2013 Jan; 21(1):370-81. PubMed ID: 23388930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of contact pressure and influence function model for soft wheel polishing.
    Rao Z; Guo B; Zhao Q
    Appl Opt; 2015 Sep; 54(27):8091-9. PubMed ID: 26406510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of workpiece curvature on the tool influence function during hemispherical sub-aperture tool glass polishing.
    Suratwala T; Menapace J; Tham G; Steele R; Wong L; Ray N; Bauman B; Gregory M; Hordin T
    Appl Opt; 2021 Feb; 60(4):1041-1050. PubMed ID: 33690410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel orthogonal velocity polishing tool and its material removal characteristics from CVD SiC mirror surfaces.
    Seo H; Han JY; Kim SW; Seong S; Yoon S; Lee K; Hong J; Lee H; Bok M
    Opt Express; 2016 May; 24(11):12349-66. PubMed ID: 27410150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Edge effect modeling and experiments on active lap processing.
    Liu H; Wu F; Zeng Z; Fan B; Wan Y
    Opt Express; 2014 May; 22(9):10761-74. PubMed ID: 24921777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling of edge effect in subaperture tool influence functions of computer controlled optical surfacing.
    Wan S; Zhang X; He X; Xu M
    Appl Opt; 2016 Dec; 55(36):10223-10228. PubMed ID: 28059243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric modeling of edge effects for polishing tool influence functions.
    Kim DW; Park WH; Kim SW; Burge JH
    Opt Express; 2009 Mar; 17(7):5656-65. PubMed ID: 19333334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tip-tilt error for extremely large segmented telescopes: detailed theoretical point-spread-function analysis and numerical simulation results.
    Yaitskova N; Dohlen K
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Jul; 19(7):1274-85. PubMed ID: 12095195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-sequential optimization technique for a computer controlled optical surfacing process using multiple tool influence functions.
    Kim DW; Kim SW; Burge JH
    Opt Express; 2009 Nov; 17(24):21850-66. PubMed ID: 19997430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified dwell time optimization model and its applications in subaperture polishing.
    Dong Z; Cheng H; Tam HY
    Appl Opt; 2014 May; 53(15):3213-24. PubMed ID: 24922206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of millimeter-scale rolled edges using bevel-cut-like tool influence function in magnetorheological jet polishing.
    Yang H; Cheng H; Feng Y; Jing X
    Appl Opt; 2018 May; 57(13):3377-3384. PubMed ID: 29726504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanisms influencing and prediction of tool influence function spots during hemispherical sub-aperture tool polishing on fused silica.
    Suratwala T; Menapace J; Steele R; Wong L; Tham G; Ray N; Bauman B; Gregory M; Hordin T
    Appl Opt; 2021 Jan; 60(1):201-214. PubMed ID: 33362091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling and prediction of tool influence function under complex edge in sub-aperture optical polishing.
    Wan S; Wei C; Hu C; Gu H; Shao J
    Opt Express; 2021 Jul; 29(15):23582-23596. PubMed ID: 34614622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical perception of the chaotic fabrication error and the self-adaptive processing decision in ultra-precision optical polishing.
    Li H; Wan S; Niu Z; Guo H; Zhang L; Lu Q; Wei C; Shao J
    Opt Express; 2023 Feb; 31(5):7707-7724. PubMed ID: 36859896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency division combined machining method to improve polishing efficiency of continuous phase plate by bonnet polishing.
    Zhong B; Deng W; Chen X; Wen S; Wang J; Xu Q
    Opt Express; 2021 Jan; 29(2):1597-1612. PubMed ID: 33726371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compensating for velocity truncation during subaperture polishing by controllable and time-variant tool influence functions.
    Dong Z; Cheng H; Tam HY
    Appl Opt; 2015 Feb; 54(5):1167-74. PubMed ID: 25968037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compensation of the tool influence function changes under neighborhood effect in atmospheric pressure plasma processing.
    Ji P; Li D; Jin Y; Su X; Wang B
    Opt Express; 2023 Nov; 31(24):39465-39482. PubMed ID: 38041268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.