163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19496233)
1. The instructed context of a motor task modulates covert response preparation and shifts of spatial attention.
Gherri E; Van Velzen J; Eimer M
Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):655-67. PubMed ID: 19496233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
Gherri E; Forster B
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing.
Eimer M; Van Velzen J; Gherri E; Press C
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 16448629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts to effectors rather than goal locations.
Forster B; Eimer M
Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 419(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 17485166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Manual response preparation disrupts spatial attention: an electrophysiological investigation of links between action and attention.
Gherri E; Eimer M
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):961-9. PubMed ID: 19944707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional modulations of visual but not auditory processing.
Eimer M; van Velzen J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 117(5):1063-74. PubMed ID: 16516545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eye movement preparation causes spatially-specific modulation of auditory processing: new evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Gherri E; Driver J; Eimer M
Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1224():88-101. PubMed ID: 18614157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavioral, Cognitive, and Motor Preparation Deficits in a Visual Cued Spatial Attention Task in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Sokhadze EM; Tasman A; Sokhadze GE; El-Baz AS; Casanova MF
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2016 Mar; 41(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 26377686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How microsaccades relate to lateralized ERP components of spatial attention: A co-registration study.
Meyberg S; Sommer W; Dimigen O
Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():64-80. PubMed ID: 28254651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
McDonald JJ; Green JJ
Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ERP correlates of shared control mechanisms involved in saccade preparation and in covert attention.
Eimer M; Van Velzen J; Gherri E; Press C
Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1135(1):154-66. PubMed ID: 17198687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissociating temporal attention from spatial attention and motor response preparation: A high-density EEG study.
Faugeras F; Naccache L
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):947-957. PubMed ID: 26433120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The orienting of attention during eye and hand movements: ERP evidence for similar frame of reference but different spatially specific modulations of tactile processing.
Gherri E; Forster B
Biol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 91(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 22750676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissociating effects of movement preparation and spatial attention on visual processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
Ley P; Röder B
Multisens Res; 2014; 27(2):139-60. PubMed ID: 25296476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visuospatial attention shift and motor responses in cerebellar disorders.
Yamaguchi S; Tsuchiya H; Kobayashi S
J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jan; 10(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 9526085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociating effector and movement direction selection during the preparation of manual reaching movements: evidence from lateralized ERP components.
Gherri E; Van Velzen J; Eimer M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Sep; 118(9):2031-49. PubMed ID: 17646131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention.
Eimer M; Forster B; Van Velzen J; Prabhu G
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):957-66. PubMed ID: 15716166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Movement planning and attentional control of visuospatial working memory: evidence from a grasp-to-place task.
Spiegel MA; Koester D; Schack T
Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):494-505. PubMed ID: 23832553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.
Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
Cereb Cortex; 2014 Mar; 24(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 23172773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
Müller MM
Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
