492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19496349)
1. Comparison of different diagnostic products for skin prick testing.
Pagani M; Antico A; Cilia M; Calabrò D; Poto S; Pecora S; Burastero SE
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2009 Feb; 41(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19496349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity and specificity of different skin prick tests with latex extracts in pediatric patients with suspected natural rubber latex allergy--a cohort study.
Bernardini R; Pucci N; Azzari C; Novembre E; De Martino M; Milani M
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2008 Jun; 19(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 18266828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].
Paranos S; Petrović S; Bojović I
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(5-6):194-9. PubMed ID: 11089421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skin prick test evaluation of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus diagnostic extracts from Europe, Mexico, and the United States.
Larenas-Linnemann D; Matta JJ; Shah-Hosseini K; Michels A; Mösges R
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2010 May; 104(5):420-5. PubMed ID: 20486333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing skin prick tests reliability in ECRHS-I.
Bousquet PJ; Chatzi L; Jarvis D; Burney P
Allergy; 2008 Mar; 63(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 18070229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concordance of lateral flow and skin prick tests in the assessment of allergen sensitisation in the epidemiological field in children.
Sanchez-Bahillo M; Garcia-Marcos L; Martinez-Torres AE; Perez-Fernandez V; Sanchez-Solis M
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2010; 152(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 20197680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skin tests with native, depigmented and glutaraldehyde polymerized allergen extracts.
Casanovas M; Gómez MJ; Carnés J; Fernández-Caldas E
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2005; 15(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 15864880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular profiles of IgE to Phleum pratense in children with grass pollen allergy: implications for specific immunotherapy.
Tripodi S; Frediani T; Lucarelli S; Macrì F; Pingitore G; Di Rienzo Businco A; Dondi A; Pansa P; Ragusa G; Asero R; Faggian D; Plebani M; Matricardi PM
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2012 Mar; 129(3):834-839.e8. PubMed ID: 22206774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of intradermal and prick tests based on samples of the most common allergens in the Zadar region].
Mazzi A
Lijec Vjesn; 1995; 117(3-4):76-9. PubMed ID: 8538357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin test diagnosis of grass pollen allergy with a recombinant hybrid molecule.
Metz-Favre C; Linhart B; Focke-Tejkl M; Purohit A; de Blay F; Valenta R; Pauli G
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Aug; 120(2):315-21. PubMed ID: 17512042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the skin-prick test and Phadia ImmunoCAP as tools to diagnose house-dust mite allergy.
Jung YG; Cho HJ; Park GY; Min JY; Kim HY; Dhong HJ; Chung SK; Kim SW
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2010; 24(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 20537291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phazet skin prick tests versus conventional prick tests with allergens and histamine in children.
Roovers MH; Gerth van Wijk R; Dieges PH; van Toorenenbergen AW
Ann Allergy; 1990 Feb; 64(2 Pt 1):166-9. PubMed ID: 1689560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Component-resolved diagnosis for phleum allergy: the role of recombinants.
De Amici M; Alesina R; Moratti R; Ciprandi G
J Asthma; 2010 Sep; 47(7):750-3. PubMed ID: 20726834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of skin test results and specific immunoglobulin E blood levels with nasal provocation testing for house-dust mite allergies.
Haxel BR; Huppertz T; Boessert P; Bast F; Fruth K
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2016; 30(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 26867532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus mite body raw material on house dust mite allergy diagnosis in a Serbian population.
Burazer L; Milovanovic K; Milovanovic M; Vuckovic O; Velickovic TC; Gavrovic-Jankulovic M
Med Vet Entomol; 2011 Mar; 25(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 20819152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective evaluation of skin prick test reactions using digital photography.
dos Santos RV; Titus RG; Lima HC
Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 17374055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization and comparison of commercially available mite extracts for in vivo diagnosis.
Brunetto B; Tinghino R; Braschi MC; Antonicelli L; Pini C; Iacovacci P
Allergy; 2010 Feb; 65(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 19796217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Limited IgE cross-reactivity between Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Glycyphagus domesticus in patients naturally exposed to both mite species.
Arias-Irigoyen J; Lombardero M; Arteaga C; Carpizo JA; Barber D
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Jul; 120(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 17412407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allergen skin prick test should be adjusted by the histamine reactivity.
Dreborg S
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2015; 166(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25765942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skin prick testing with standardized extracts from 3 different manufacturers. A comparative randomized study.
Nielsen NH; Dirksen A; Mosbech H; Launbjerg J; Biering I; Søborg M
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1992; 20(6):246-8. PubMed ID: 1296467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]