These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19496396)
1. Behavior under impact of two polyvinyl acetate-polyethylene (PVA-PE) polymers and one elastomer--application to custom-made mouthguards. Poisson P; Viot P; Petit J Dent Mater J; 2009 Mar; 28(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 19496396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An improved mouthguard material. Westerman B; Stringfellow PM; Eccleston JA Aust Dent J; 1997 Jun; 42(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 9241931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical behavior of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) used for fabrication of mouthguards and interocclusal splints. Coto NP; Brito e Dias R; COSTA RA; ANTONIAZZI TF; de Carvalho EP Braz Dent J; 2007; 18(4):324-8. PubMed ID: 19031647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Materials for mouth protectors]. Kloeg EF; Collys K Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2003; 58(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 12894661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect on energy absorption of hard inserts in laminated EVA mouthguards. Westerman B; Stringfellow PM; Eccleston JA Aust Dent J; 2000 Mar; 45(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 10846268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does hard insertion and space improve shock absorption ability of mouthguard? Takeda T; Ishigami K; Handa J; Naitoh K; Kurokawa K; Shibusawa M; Nakajima K; Kawamura S Dent Traumatol; 2006 Apr; 22(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 16499630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the shock absorption capacities of different mouthguards. Bochnig MS; Oh MJ; Nagel T; Ziegler F; Jost-Brinkmann PG Dent Traumatol; 2017 Jun; 33(3):205-213. PubMed ID: 28231638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forces transmitted through EVA mouthguard materials of different types and thickness. Westerman B; Stringfellow PM; Eccleston JA Aust Dent J; 1995 Dec; 40(6):389-91. PubMed ID: 8615745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of impact object characteristics on impact force and force absorption by mouthguard material. Takeda T; Ishigami K; Shintaro K; Nakajima K; Shimada A; Regner CW Dent Traumatol; 2004 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 14998410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shock absorption capacities of mouthguards in different types and thicknesses. Bemelmanns P; Pfeiffer P Int J Sports Med; 2001 Feb; 22(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 11281619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of impact force reduction by polymer materials used for mouthguard fabrication. Gawlak D; Mańka-Malara K; Mierzwińska-Nastalska E; Gieleta R; Kamiński T; Łuniewska M Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 28552930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A visco-hyperelastic constitutive approach for modeling polyvinyl alcohol sponge. Karimi A; Navidbakhsh M; Beigzadeh B Tissue Cell; 2014 Feb; 46(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 24405852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques. Mishra S; Chowdhary R J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of mouthguards: Impact performance. Guérard S; Barou JL; Petit J; Poisson P Dent Traumatol; 2017 Aug; 33(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 28190286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]