These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19497671)

  • 1. Detective quantum efficiency of electron area detectors in electron microscopy.
    McMullan G; Chen S; Henderson R; Faruqi AR
    Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Aug; 109(9):1126-43. PubMed ID: 19497671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electron imaging with Medipix2 hybrid pixel detector.
    McMullan G; Cattermole DM; Chen S; Henderson R; Llopart X; Summerfield C; Tlustos L; Faruqi AR
    Ultramicroscopy; 2007; 107(4-5):401-13. PubMed ID: 17140733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental observation of the improvement in MTF from backthinning a CMOS direct electron detector.
    McMullan G; Faruqi AR; Henderson R; Guerrini N; Turchetta R; Jacobs A; van Hoften G
    Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Aug; 109(9):1144-7. PubMed ID: 19541421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronic detectors for electron microscopy.
    Faruqi AR; McMullan G
    Q Rev Biophys; 2011 Aug; 44(3):357-90. PubMed ID: 21524337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of a Timepix detector for use in SEM acceleration voltage range.
    Denisov N; Jannis D; Orekhov A; Müller-Caspary K; Verbeeck J
    Ultramicroscopy; 2023 Nov; 253():113777. PubMed ID: 37336162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying the performance of a hybrid pixel detector with GaAs:Cr sensor for transmission electron microscopy.
    Paton KA; Veale MC; Mu X; Allen CS; Maneuski D; Kübel C; O'Shea V; Kirkland AI; McGrouther D
    Ultramicroscopy; 2021 Aug; 227():113298. PubMed ID: 34051540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic detectors for electron microscopy.
    Faruqi AR; Henderson R
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2007 Oct; 17(5):549-55. PubMed ID: 17913494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of optimal performance at 300keV of three direct electron detectors for use in low dose electron microscopy.
    McMullan G; Faruqi AR; Clare D; Henderson R
    Ultramicroscopy; 2014 Dec; 147():156-63. PubMed ID: 25194828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterisation of the Medipix3 detector for 60 and 80keV electrons.
    Mir JA; Clough R; MacInnes R; Gough C; Plackett R; Shipsey I; Sawada H; MacLaren I; Ballabriga R; Maneuski D; O'Shea V; McGrouther D; Kirkland AI
    Ultramicroscopy; 2017 Nov; 182():44-53. PubMed ID: 28654827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating direct detection detectors for short-range order characterization of amorphous materials by electron scattering.
    Basha A; Levi G; Houben L; Amrani T; Goldfarb I; Kohn A
    Ultramicroscopy; 2023 Jul; 249():113737. PubMed ID: 37037087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative characterization of electron detectors for transmission electron microscopy.
    Ruskin AI; Yu Z; Grigorieff N
    J Struct Biol; 2013 Dec; 184(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 24189638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of SEM scintillation detector evaluated by modulation transfer function and detective quantum efficiency function.
    Bok J; Schauer P
    Scanning; 2014; 36(4):384-93. PubMed ID: 24323770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of x-ray detectors for mouse CT imaging.
    Goertzen AL; Nagarkar V; Street RA; Paulus MJ; Boone JM; Cherry SR
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(23):5251-65. PubMed ID: 15656275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
    Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Principles and prospects of direct high resolution electron image acquisition with CMOS detectors at low energies.
    Faruqi AR
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2009 Aug; 21(31):314004. PubMed ID: 21828565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
    Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seven general radiography x-ray detectors with pixel sizes ranging from 175 to 76
    Marshall NW; Vandenbroucke D; Cockmartin L; Wanninger F; Smet M; Feng Y; Ni Y; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 68(19):. PubMed ID: 37659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 30488455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.