These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19499468)

  • 1. The King LT versus the Combitube: flight crew performance and preference.
    Tumpach EA; Lutes M; Ford D; Lerner EB
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 19499468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the King-LT to endotracheal intubation and Combitube in a simulated difficult airway.
    Russi CS; Miller L; Hartley MJ
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2008; 12(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 18189175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prehospital pediatric King LT-D use: a pilot study.
    Ritter SC; Guyette FX
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 21480773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The laryngeal tube device: a simple and timely adjunct to airway management.
    Russi CS; Wilcox CL; House HR
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Mar; 25(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 17349898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulated rescue airway use by laypersons with scripted telephonic instruction.
    Beauchamp G; Phrampus P; Guyette FX
    Resuscitation; 2009 Aug; 80(8):925-9. PubMed ID: 19481853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. King LT-D use by urban basic life support first responders as the primary airway device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Gahan K; Studnek JR; Vandeventer S
    Resuscitation; 2011 Dec; 82(12):1525-8. PubMed ID: 21756859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices--a manikin study.
    Ruetzler K; Roessler B; Potura L; Priemayr A; Robak O; Schuster E; Frass M
    Resuscitation; 2011 May; 82(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 21353364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bougie-assisted intubation with traditional endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway.
    Messa MJ; Kupas DF; Dunham DL
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 21067319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Airway management by paramedics using endotracheal intubation with a laryngoscope versus the oesophageal tracheal Combitube and EasyTube on manikins: a randomised experimental trial.
    Bollig G; Løvhaug SW; Sagen Ø; Svendsen MV; Steen PA; Wik L
    Resuscitation; 2006 Oct; 71(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 16942827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paramedic King Laryngeal Tube airway insertion versus endotracheal intubation in simulated pediatric respiratory arrest.
    Mitchell MS; Lee White M; King WD; Wang HE
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2012; 16(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 22229954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the speed, success rate, and retention of rescue airway devices placed by first-responder emergency medical technicians: a high-fidelity human patient simulation study.
    Voscopoulos C; Barker T; Listwa T; Nelson S; Pozner C; Liu X; Zane R; Antoine JA
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 44(4):784-9. PubMed ID: 22980415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emergency airway placement by EMS providers: comparison between the King LT supralaryngeal airway and endotracheal intubation.
    Burns JB; Branson R; Barnes SL; Tsuei BJ
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2010; 25(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 20405470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Successful training of HEMS personnel in laryngeal mask airway and intubating laryngeal mask airway placement.
    Frascone RJ; Pippert G; Heegaard W; Molinari P; Dries D
    Air Med J; 2008; 27(4):185-7. PubMed ID: 18603215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. King airway use by air medical providers.
    Guyette FX; Wang H; Cole JS
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 17907036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the King LTS-D during medication-assisted airway management.
    Frascone RJ; Wewerka SS; Griffith KR; Salzman JG
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(4):541-5. PubMed ID: 19731170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of prehospital insertion success rates and time to insertion between standard endotracheal intubation and a supraglottic airway.
    Frascone RJ; Russi C; Lick C; Conterato M; Wewerka SS; Griffith KR; Myers L; Conners J; Salzman JG
    Resuscitation; 2011 Dec; 82(12):1529-36. PubMed ID: 21763247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of airway management techniques with restricted access to patient airway.
    Hoyle JD; Jones JS; Deibel M; Lock DT; Reischman D
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 17613909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Students insert the laryngeal tube quicker and more often successful than the esophageal-tracheal combitube in a manikin.
    Hüter L; Schwarzkopf K; Rödiger J; Preussler NP; Schreiber T
    Resuscitation; 2009 Aug; 80(8):930-4. PubMed ID: 19481851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of endotracheal intubation and rescue techniques by emergency services personnel in an air medical service.
    Germann CA; Baumann MR; Kendall KM; Strout TD; McGraw K
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19145523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What happens with failed blind nasal tracheal intubations?
    Brown J; Thomas F
    Air Med J; 2001; 20(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 11250613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.