These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

10193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19499576)

  • 1. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.
    Trott O; Olson AJ
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Jan; 31(2):455-61. PubMed ID: 19499576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QuickVina: accelerating AutoDock Vina using gradient-based heuristics for global optimization.
    Handoko SD; Ouyang X; Su CT; Kwoh CK; Ong YS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1266-72. PubMed ID: 22641710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
    Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
    Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening.
    Quiroga R; Villarreal MA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155183. PubMed ID: 27171006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AutoDock VinaXB: implementation of XBSF, new empirical halogen bond scoring function, into AutoDock Vina.
    Koebel MR; Schmadeke G; Posner RG; Sirimulla S
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():27. PubMed ID: 27195023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accelerating AutoDock Vina with GPUs.
    Tang S; Chen R; Lin M; Lin Q; Zhu Y; Ding J; Hu H; Ling M; Wu J
    Molecules; 2022 May; 27(9):. PubMed ID: 35566391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NNScore 2.0: a neural-network receptor-ligand scoring function.
    Durrant JD; McCammon JA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2897-903. PubMed ID: 22017367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chaos-embedded particle swarm optimization approach for protein-ligand docking and virtual screening.
    Tai HK; Jusoh SA; Siu SWI
    J Cheminform; 2018 Dec; 10(1):62. PubMed ID: 30552524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vina-GPU 2.0: Further Accelerating AutoDock Vina and Its Derivatives with Graphics Processing Units.
    Ding J; Tang S; Mei Z; Wang L; Huang Q; Hu H; Ling M; Wu J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Apr; 63(7):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 36941232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
    Kumar SP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using AutoDock for ligand-receptor docking.
    Morris GM; Huey R; Olson AJ
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; Chapter 8():Unit 8.14. PubMed ID: 19085980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual screening for HIV protease inhibitors: a comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina.
    Chang MW; Ayeni C; Breuer S; Torbett BE
    PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e11955. PubMed ID: 20694138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DockingApp RF: A State-of-the-Art Novel Scoring Function for Molecular Docking in a User-Friendly Interface to AutoDock Vina.
    Macari G; Toti D; Pasquadibisceglie A; Polticelli F
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(24):. PubMed ID: 33333976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings.
    Eberhardt J; Santos-Martins D; Tillack AF; Forli S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Aug; 61(8):3891-3898. PubMed ID: 34278794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational insight into the phthalocyanine-DNA binding via docking and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Ozalp L; Sağ Erdem S; Yüce-Dursun B; Mutlu Ö; Özbil M
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Dec; 77():87-96. PubMed ID: 30245350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 Benchmark.
    Gaillard T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 29989806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the binding performance of flavonoids to estrogen receptor alpha by Autodock, Autodock Vina and Surflex-Dock.
    Xue Q; Liu X; Russell P; Li J; Pan W; Fu J; Zhang A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Mar; 233():113323. PubMed ID: 35183811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical assessment of the automated AutoDock as a new docking tool for virtual screening.
    Park H; Lee J; Lee S
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 16988956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BDT: an easy-to-use front-end application for automation of massive docking tasks and complex docking strategies with AutoDock.
    Vaqué M; Arola A; Aliagas C; Pujadas G
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1803-4. PubMed ID: 16720587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 510.