470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19499742)
1. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests.
Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Diagnostic accuracy].
Simundić AM
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The misuse of predictive value--or why you must consider the odds.
Gambino R
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 1809058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
Bowden SC; Loring DW
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1287-8; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 15765500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Design and analysis of a study on reliability and validity of diagnostic tests in urological clinical research].
Fernández Pérez C; Moreno Sierra J; Barreales Tolosa L; Ramírez de Molina V
Arch Esp Urol; 2003; 56(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 12958999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic utility of Wada Memory Asymmetries: sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio characterization.
Loring DW; Bowden SC; Lee GP; Meador KJ
Neuropsychology; 2009 Nov; 23(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 19899827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Systematic reviews in practice. X. Searching, selecting and the methodological assessment of diagnostic evaluation research].
Devillé WL; Bossuyt PM; de Vet HC; Bezemer PD; Bouter LM; Assendelft WJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(48):2281-4. PubMed ID: 12497754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Daya S
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
Eusebi P
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the diagnostic contribution of a test. Main information indices].
Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 75(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 8151557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: a latent class model approach.
Garrett ES; Eaton WW; Zeger S
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1289-307. PubMed ID: 12111879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology].
Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
