239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19500337)
1. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information.
Ulph F; Townsend E; Glazebrook C
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19500337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of format on comprehension of adherence data in chronic disease: A cross-sectional study in HIV.
Lyons A; Bilker WB; Hines J; Gross R
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jan; 99(1):154-9. PubMed ID: 26324110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments.
Armstrong BA; Sparrow EP; Spaniol J
Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 32659157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels: A Randomized Trial.
Sinayev A; Peters E; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):937-47. PubMed ID: 25952743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk communication formats for low probability events: an exploratory study of patient preferences.
Dolan JG; Iadarola S
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Apr; 8():14. PubMed ID: 18402680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt?
Barnes AJ; Hanoch Y; Miron-Shatz T; Ozanne EM
Health Psychol; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1007-16. PubMed ID: 27183307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations.
Lipkus IM
Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 17873259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Presenting time-based risks of stroke and death for Patients facing carotid stenosis treatment options: Patients prefer pie charts over icon arrays.
Scalia P; O'Malley AJ; Durand MA; Goodney PP; Elwyn G
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Oct; 102(10):1939-1944. PubMed ID: 31101429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial.
Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 21768582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: the case of prenatal screening.
Miron-Shatz T; Hanoch Y; Graef D; Sagi M
J Health Commun; 2009; 14(5):439-50. PubMed ID: 19657924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Communicating the risk of side effects to patients: an evaluation of UK regulatory recommendations.
Knapp P; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; McMillan B
Drug Saf; 2009; 32(10):837-49. PubMed ID: 19722727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health Professionals Prefer to Communicate Risk-Related Numerical Information Using "1-in-X" Ratios.
Sirota M; Juanchich M; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Walasek L; Bhatia S
Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):366-376. PubMed ID: 29068246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence.
Trevena LJ; Davey HM; Barratt A; Butow P; Caldwell P
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Feb; 12(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 16422776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How is cervical cancer screening information communicated in UK websites? Cross-sectional analysis of content and quantitative presentation formats.
Okan Y; Smith SG; Bruine de Bruin W
BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e029551. PubMed ID: 31662361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy.
Albers EAC; Fraterman I; Walraven I; Wilthagen E; Schagen SB; van der Ploeg IM; Wouters MWJM; van de Poll-Franse LV; de Ligt KM
J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Mar; 6(1):18. PubMed ID: 35239055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: a study of six presentation formats.
Brundage M; Feldman-Stewart D; Leis A; Bezjak A; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):6949-56. PubMed ID: 16192583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search.
Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
