These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19500527)
1. Performance evaluation of the automated NucliSens easyMAG nucleic acid extraction platform in comparison with QIAamp Mini kit from clinical specimens. Perandin F; Pollara PC; Gargiulo F; Bonfanti C; Manca N Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Jun; 64(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 19500527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of NucliSens easyMAG for automated nucleic acid extraction from various clinical specimens. Loens K; Bergs K; Ursi D; Goossens H; Ieven M J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 45(2):421-5. PubMed ID: 17166966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of the QIAGEN QIAsymphony® SP system and bioMérieux NucliSens easyMAG automated extraction platforms in a clinical virology laboratory. Lee AV; Atkinson C; Manuel RJ; Clark DA J Clin Virol; 2011 Dec; 52(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 22014618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extraction of viral nucleic acids: comparison of five automated nucleic acid extraction platforms. Verheyen J; Kaiser R; Bozic M; Timmen-Wego M; Maier BK; Kessler HH J Clin Virol; 2012 Jul; 54(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 22503856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated extraction of viral-pathogen RNA and DNA for high-throughput quantitative real-time PCR. Beuselinck K; van Ranst M; van Eldere J J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 43(11):5541-6. PubMed ID: 16272483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of two automated systems for nucleic acid extraction of BK virus: NucliSens easyMAG versus BioRobot MDx. Kim S; Park SJ; Namgoong S; Sung H; Kim MN J Virol Methods; 2009 Dec; 162(1-2):208-12. PubMed ID: 19712698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a new automated, standardized generic nucleic acid extraction method (total nucleic acid isolation kit) used in combination with cytomegalovirus DNA quantification by COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR. Gärtner BC; Fischinger JM; Litwicki A; Roemer K; Mueller-Lantzsch N J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Aug; 42(8):3881-2. PubMed ID: 15297555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of an automated high-volume extraction method for viral nucleic acids in comparison to a manual procedure with preceding enrichment. Hourfar MK; Schmidt M; Seifried E; Roth WK Vox Sang; 2005 Aug; 89(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 16101686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduced PCR sensitivity due to impaired DNA recovery with the MagNA Pure LC total nucleic acid isolation kit. Schuurman T; van Breda A; de Boer R; Kooistra-Smid M; Beld M; Savelkoul P; Boom R J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4616-22. PubMed ID: 16145116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a commercial real-time PCR assay for quantitation of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in different groups of patients. Kozić S; Vince A; Bes JI; Rode OD; Lepej SZ; Poljak M; Bozic M; Kessler HH J Virol Methods; 2006 Aug; 135(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 16650904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 and RealTime HIV-1 kits for quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma. Choi JY; Kim EJ; Rho HJ; Kim JY; Kwon OK; Lee JH; Koo MJ; Kim SS J Virol Methods; 2009 Oct; 161(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 19576640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the TaqMan Influenza A Detection Kit and a rapid automated total nucleic acid extraction method to detect influenza A virus in nasopharyngeal specimens. Bolotin S; De Lima C; Choi KW; Lombos E; Burton L; Mazzulli T; Drews SJ Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 19429802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Analysis of the results of NEQAS international external quality assessment programme for hepatitis B and C virus nucleic acid tests]. Sayan M; Willke A; Meriç M; Etiler N Mikrobiyol Bul; 2009 Jan; 43(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 19334386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of a commercially available automated system for extraction of viral DNA from whole blood: application to monitoring of epstein-barr virus and cytomegalovirus load. Pillet S; Bourlet T; Pozzetto B J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 47(11):3753-5. PubMed ID: 19710270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of eMAG™ versus NucliSENS Garcia M; Chessa C; Bourgoin A; Giraudeau G; Plouzeau C; Agius G; Lévêque N; Beby-Defaux A J Clin Virol; 2017 Mar; 88():52-57. PubMed ID: 28160729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an automated extraction system in combination with Affigene CMV Trender for CMV DNA quantitative determination: comparison with nested PCR and pp65 antigen test. Abbate I; Finnstrom N; Zaniratti S; Solmone MC; Selvaggini S; Bennici E; Neri S; Brega C; Paterno M; Capobianchi MR J Virol Methods; 2008 Jul; 151(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18462815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative detection of HIV-1 RNA using NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 assay. Yao J; Liu Z; Ko LS; Pan G; Jiang Y J Virol Methods; 2005 Oct; 129(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 15961170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Detecting Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Using Real-Time PCR: A Comparison Study Between the QIAsymphony RGQ and QIAcube Systems. Kim H; Hur M; Kim JY; Moon HW; Yun YM; Cho HC Ann Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 28028999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Verification of an assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA by use of an analyte-specific reagent and two different extraction methods. Forman MS; Valsamakis A J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Aug; 42(8):3581-8. PubMed ID: 15297501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two highly automated DNA extraction systems for quantifying Epstein-Barr virus in whole blood. Mengelle C; Legrand-Abravanel F; Mansuy JM; Barthe C; Da Silva I; Izopet J J Clin Virol; 2008 Nov; 43(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 18819838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]