443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19500598)
1. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation.
Härdling R; Karlsson K
J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 19500598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Replicator-dynamics models of sexual conflict.
Kimura M; Ihara Y
J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19505480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
Doebeli M
J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes.
Moore AJ; Pizzari T
Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S88-97. PubMed ID: 15795865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assortative mating through a mechanism of sexual selection.
Castro L; Toro MA
J Theor Biol; 2006 Dec; 243(3):386-92. PubMed ID: 16928384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assortative mating counteracts the evolution of dispersal polymorphisms.
Fronhofer EA; Kubisch A; Hovestadt T; Poethke HJ
Evolution; 2011 Sep; 65(9):2461-9. PubMed ID: 21884049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual conflict and speciation.
Parker GA; Partridge L
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic differentiation by sexual conflict.
Hayashi TI; Vose M; Gavrilets S
Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):516-29. PubMed ID: 17348917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assortative mating for fitness and the evolution of recombination.
Blachford A; Agrawal AF
Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1337-43. PubMed ID: 16929651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes.
Hosken DJ; Stockley P; Tregenza T; Wedell N
Annu Rev Entomol; 2009; 54():361-78. PubMed ID: 18793102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
McKean KA; Nunney L
Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict.
Gavrilets S
Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6772):886-9. PubMed ID: 10706284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism.
Albert AY; Otto SP
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):119-21. PubMed ID: 16210543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intralocus sexual conflict.
van Doorn GS
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():52-71. PubMed ID: 19566703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J
Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
