390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19500848)
1. Dynamic contour tonometry: handheld versus slit-lamp-mounted.
Knecht PB; Bosch MM; Menke MN; Bachmann LM; Funk J; Kaufmann C
Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1450-4. PubMed ID: 19500848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].
Viestenz A; Langenbucher A; Viestenz A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Erdurmus M; Totan Y; Hepsen IF; Yagci R
Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 18259205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and goldmann tonometry.
Hamilton KE; Pye DC; Kao L; Pham N; Tran AQ
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 85(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 18521023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry.
Hoffmann EM; Grus FH; Pfeiffer N
BMC Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 4():4. PubMed ID: 15038831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
Bochmann F; Kaufmann C; Becht C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 19384775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements.
Boehm AG; Weber A; Pillunat LE; Koch R; Spoerl E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2472-7. PubMed ID: 18316699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with asymmetric primary open-angle glaucoma.
Kac MJ; Solari HP; Velarde GC; Brazuna R; Cardoso GP; Ventura MP
Curr Eye Res; 2011 Aug; 36(8):727-32. PubMed ID: 21780922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a contact lens-embedded sensor for intraocular pressure measurement.
Twa MD; Roberts CJ; Karol HJ; Mahmoud AM; Weber PA; Small RH
J Glaucoma; 2010 Aug; 19(6):382-90. PubMed ID: 20051894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical assessment of dynamic contour tonometer].
Shi W; Zhong Y; Dong FT; Xu P; Wang RY
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 44(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 18953894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer performance in a developing world setting: intraocular pressure measurement acquisition and precision.
Cheng J; Salam T; Russell PJ; Heath DG; Kotecha A
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):736-9. PubMed ID: 23708422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
