These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19501350)

  • 1. The role of automatic orienting of attention towards ipsilesional stimuli in non-visual (tactile and auditory) neglect: a critical review.
    Gainotti G
    Cortex; 2010 Feb; 46(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 19501350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reflexive orienting in spatial neglect is biased towards behaviourally salient stimuli.
    Ptak R; Schnider A
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Mar; 16(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 15901652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A dissociation between visual and auditory hemi-inattention: Evidence from temporal order judgements.
    Sinnett S; Juncadella M; Rafal R; Azañón E; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):552-60. PubMed ID: 16690089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli.
    Oruc I; Sinnett S; Bischof WF; Soto-Faraco S; Lock K; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():200-8. PubMed ID: 18514172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neglect and extinction: within and between sensory modalities.
    Brozzoli C; Demattè ML; Pavani F; Frassinetti F; Farnè A
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2006; 24(4-6):217-32. PubMed ID: 17119300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sustained interactions between perception and action in visual extinction and neglect: evidence from sequential pointing.
    Kitadono K; Humphreys GW
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1592-9. PubMed ID: 19059423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A common basis for visual and tactile exploration deficits in spatial neglect?
    Schindler I; Clavagnier S; Karnath HO; Derex L; Perenin MT
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1444-51. PubMed ID: 16499936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage.
    Mattingley JB; Driver J; Beschin N; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Jun; 35(6):867-80. PubMed ID: 9204491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuropsychological evidence of modular organization of the near peripersonal space.
    Farnè A; Demattè ML; Làdavas E
    Neurology; 2005 Dec; 65(11):1754-8. PubMed ID: 16344519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between auditory and visual symptoms of unilateral spatial neglect.
    Eramudugolla R; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(11):2631-7. PubMed ID: 17451758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neglect: a multisensory deficit?
    Jacobs S; Brozzoli C; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1029-44. PubMed ID: 22465475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What kind of visual spatial attention is impaired in neglect?
    Natale E; Posteraro L; Prior M; Marzi CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(7):1072-85. PubMed ID: 15769493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial gradient for unique-feature detection in patients with unilateral neglect: evidence from auditory and visual search.
    Eramudugolla R; Mattingley JB
    Neurocase; 2008; 15(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 19031339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.