BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19501454)

  • 1. Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy.
    Budäus L; Isbarn H; Schlomm T; Heinzer H; Haese A; Steuber T; Salomon G; Huland H; Graefen M
    Eur Urol; 2009 Aug; 56(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 19501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
    Marien TP; Lepor H
    BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
    Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
    Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy--effect and risks].
    Borre M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Aug; 170(34):2549-54. PubMed ID: 18761837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
    Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
    Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results from 1620 consecutive patients.
    Ayyathurai R; Manoharan M; Nieder AM; Kava B; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(7):833-6. PubMed ID: 18190627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potency-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: a simplified anatomical approach.
    Ruckle HC; Zincke H
    J Urol; 1995 Jun; 153(6):1875-7. PubMed ID: 7752337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients.
    Kaul S; Savera A; Badani K; Fumo M; Bhandari A; Menon M
    BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 16469009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.
    Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Grande S; Morra I; Scarpa RM
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1377-83. PubMed ID: 19243886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures.
    Stolzenburg JU; Do M; Rabenalt R; Pfeiffer H; Horn L; Truss MC; Jonas U; Dorschner W
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2066-71. PubMed ID: 12771721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Graefen M; Walz J; Huland H
    Eur Urol; 2006 Jan; 49(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 16332409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.
    Catalona WJ; Carvalhal GF; Mager DE; Smith DS
    J Urol; 1999 Aug; 162(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 10411052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes.
    Patel VR; Coelho RF; Palmer KJ; Rocco B
    Eur Urol; 2009 Sep; 56(3):472-8. PubMed ID: 19560260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy--does it have an impact on urinary continence?
    Burkhard FC; Kessler TM; Fleischmann A; Thalmann GN; Schumacher M; Studer UE
    J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 16753399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Palisaar JR; Wenske S; Sommerer F; Hinkel A; Noldus J
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 19298408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.
    Stolzenburg JU; Rabenalt R; Tannapfel A; Liatsikos EN
    Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16413324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique.
    Curto F; Benijts J; Pansadoro A; Barmoshe S; Hoepffner JL; Mugnier C; Piechaud T; Gaston R
    Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 16413102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The failure of a nerve sparing template to improve urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: attention to study design.
    Tzou DT; Dalkin BL; Christopher BA; Cui H
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 18439849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.