121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19502989)
21. Comparative study of quantitative ultrasonography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for evaluating renal osteodystrophy in children with chronic kidney disease.
Christoforidis A; Printza N; Gkogka C; Siomou E; Challa A; Kazantzidou E; Kollios K; Papachristou F
J Bone Miner Metab; 2011 May; 29(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 20845051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?
Hudelmaier M; Kuhn V; Lochmüller EM; Well H; Priemel M; Link TM; Eckstein F
Osteoporos Int; 2004 May; 15(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 14740151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The relationship between spinal and appendicular bone mass modified by physical, historical, and lifestyle factors.
Ishikawa K; Ohta T; Tahara Y; Suzuki T
J Bone Miner Metab; 2000; 18(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 10783852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Quantitative ultrasound scans of the calcaneus: a useful tool for screening osteoporosis in patients with connective tissue disease].
Wang Y; Zhou W; Hao YJ; Li GT; Deng XR; Zhao J; Zhang ZL
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Oct; 45(5):766-9. PubMed ID: 24136275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identifying osteoporosis in a primary care setting with quantitative ultrasound: relationship to anthropometric and lifestyle factors.
Gemalmaz A; Discigil G; Sensoy N; Basak O
J Bone Miner Metab; 2007; 25(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 17447117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population.
Haugeberg G; Ørstavik RE; Uhlig T; Falch JA; Halse JI; Kvien TK
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 12730749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of nutrition, puberty, and gender on bone ultrasound measurements in adolescents and young adults.
Pettinato AA; Loud KJ; Bristol SK; Feldman HA; Gordon CM
J Adolesc Health; 2006 Dec; 39(6):828-34. PubMed ID: 17116512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Discriminatory ability of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone status in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Turk N; Kastelan D; Cukovic-Cavka S; Kraljevic I; Korsic M; Vucelic B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 17434664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Measurement properties of radial and tibial speed of sound for screening bone fragility in 10- to 12-year-old boys and girls.
Rebocho LM; Cardadeiro G; Zymbal V; Gonçalves EM; Sardinha LB; Baptista F
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 24206868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA].
Schnabel M; Eser G; Ziller V; Mann D; Mann E; Hadji P
Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Which bone densitometry and which skeletal site are clinically useful for monitoring bone mass?
Ito M; Nishida A; Kono J; Kono M; Uetani M; Hayashi K
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Dec; 14(12):959-64. PubMed ID: 12955312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differential effects of hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density and axial transmission ultrasound measurements in cortical bone.
Knapp KM; Blake GM; Spector TD; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 12730793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Skeletal status assessment by quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry in children with different renal conditions.
Adamczyk P; Szczepanska M; Pluskiewicz W
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Dec; 29(12):2667-2675. PubMed ID: 30128765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reference values for quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) of radius and tibia in healthy greek pediatric population: clinical correlations.
Christoforidis A; Papadopoulou E; Dimitriadou M; Stilpnopoulou D; Gkogka C; Katzos G; Athanassiou-Metaxa M
J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 19577938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of bone mass and quality in children and young adults with juvenile onset systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE): role of bone mass determinants analyzed by DXA, PQCT and QUS.
Stagi S; Cavalli L; Bertini F; Matucci Cerinic M; Luisa Brandi M; Falcini F
Lupus; 2014; 23(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 24218395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk.
Hans D; Baim S
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):322-333. PubMed ID: 28739081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women.
Dubois EF; van den Bergh JP; Smals AG; van de Meerendonk CW; Zwinderman AH; Schweitzer DH
Neth J Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):62-70. PubMed ID: 11166447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
