These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19504363)

  • 21. The effect of numerical distance and stimulus probability on ERP components elicited by numerical incongruencies in mental addition.
    Szucs D; Csépe V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 15653300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation.
    Lansbergen MM; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2247-54. PubMed ID: 18762447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How personal earthquake experience impacts on the Stroop interference effect: an event-related potential study.
    Qiu J; Su Y; Li H; Wei D; Tu S; Zhang Q
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):995-1001. PubMed ID: 20409010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiological correlates of task conflicts in task-switching.
    Hsieh S; Liu H
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1203():116-25. PubMed ID: 18314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Yeung N; Cohen JD
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 14693011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks.
    Tillman CM; Wiens S
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1405-11. PubMed ID: 21457276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Different time courses of Stroop and Garner effects in perception--an event-related potentials study.
    Boenke LT; Ohl FW; Nikolaev AR; Lachmann T; Leeuwen Cv
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 45(4):1272-88. PubMed ID: 19349240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus ambiguity elicits response conflict.
    Szmalec A; Verbruggen F; Vandierendonck A; De Baene W; Verguts T; Notebaert W
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 18329807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sex differences in electrophysiological indices of conflict monitoring.
    Clayson PE; Clawson A; Larson MJ
    Biol Psychol; 2011 May; 87(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 21470571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task.
    Stahl J; Gibbons H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 17188565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm.
    Masaki H; Takasawa N; Yamazaki K
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jul; 37(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 10934905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anticipatory postural control associated with bilateral arm flexion and event-related potential in a Kanji Stroop-like task.
    Shen X; Fujiwara K; Tomita H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 120(4):827-33. PubMed ID: 19303355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1398-412. PubMed ID: 19803645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. P300-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: the evidence still favors the response selection hypothesis.
    Rosenfeld JP; Skogsberg KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jun; 60(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 16102861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emotional conflict occurs at an early stage: evidence from the emotional face-word Stroop task.
    Zhu XR; Zhang HJ; Wu TT; Luo WB; Luo YJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jun; 478(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20417689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Disentangling sequential effects of stimulus- and response-related conflict and stimulus-response repetition using brain potentials.
    Wendt M; Heldmann M; Münte TF; Kluwe RH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1104-12. PubMed ID: 17583987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological correlates of block-wise strategic adaptations to consciously and unconsciously triggered conflict.
    Jiang J; van Gaal S; Bailey K; Chen A; Zhang Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2791-8. PubMed ID: 24055539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of repetition priming on electrophysiological and behavioral indices of conflict adaptation and cognitive control.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1621-30. PubMed ID: 21806636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Individualized EEG source reconstruction of Stroop interference with masked color words.
    Bruchmann M; Herper K; Konrad C; Pantev C; Huster RJ
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1800-9. PubMed ID: 19781651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Combined expectancies: event-related potentials reveal the early benefits of spatial attention that are obscured by reaction time measures.
    Handy TC; Green V; Klein RM; Mangun GR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):303-17. PubMed ID: 11318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.