191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19505853)
1. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint.
Zegerman P; Diffley JF
DNA Repair (Amst); 2009 Sep; 8(9):1077-88. PubMed ID: 19505853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems.
Budzowska M; Kanaar R
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2009; 53(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 19034694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA replication: a complex matter.
Frouin I; Montecucco A; Spadari S; Maga G
EMBO Rep; 2003 Jul; 4(7):666-70. PubMed ID: 12835753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Regulation and DNA damage/replication stress responses at the eukaryotic replication fork complex: overview].
Tsurimoto T
Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso; 2009 Mar; 54(4 Suppl):370-3. PubMed ID: 21089477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Replisome components--post-translational modifications and their effects.
Zech J; Dalgaard JZ
Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2014 Jun; 30():144-53. PubMed ID: 24685613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Controlling DNA replication origins in response to DNA damage - inhibit globally, activate locally.
Yekezare M; Gómez-González B; Diffley JF
J Cell Sci; 2013 Mar; 126(Pt 6):1297-306. PubMed ID: 23645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA replication fork proteins.
Hübscher U
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 521():19-33. PubMed ID: 19563099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanisms of damage tolerance and repair during DNA replication.
Ashour ME; Mosammaparast N
Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Apr; 49(6):3033-3047. PubMed ID: 33693881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
Jones RM; Petermann E
Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA replication: keep moving and don't mind the gap.
Langston LD; O'Donnell M
Mol Cell; 2006 Jul; 23(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 16857582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Roles of DNA polymerases in replication, repair, and recombination in eukaryotes.
Pavlov YI; Shcherbakova PV; Rogozin IB
Int Rev Cytol; 2006; 255():41-132. PubMed ID: 17178465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Replication fork stalling by bulky DNA damage: localization at active origins and checkpoint modulation.
Minca EC; Kowalski D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Apr; 39(7):2610-23. PubMed ID: 21138968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Origin licensing and programmed cell death: a hypothesis.
Burhans WC; Blanchard F; Baumann H
Cell Death Differ; 2002 Sep; 9(9):870-2. PubMed ID: 12181737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Replisome Dynamics and Their Functional Relevance upon DNA Damage through the PCNA Interactome.
Srivastava M; Chen Z; Zhang H; Tang M; Wang C; Jung SY; Chen J
Cell Rep; 2018 Dec; 25(13):3869-3883.e4. PubMed ID: 30590055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unchecked nick ligation can promote localized genome re-replication.
Johansson E; Diffley JFX
Curr Biol; 2021 Jun; 31(11):R710-R711. PubMed ID: 34102115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA replication and progression through S phase.
Takeda DY; Dutta A
Oncogene; 2005 Apr; 24(17):2827-43. PubMed ID: 15838518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tolerating DNA damage during eukaryotic chromosome replication.
Saugar I; Ortiz-Bazán MÁ; Tercero JA
Exp Cell Res; 2014 Nov; 329(1):170-7. PubMed ID: 25038291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The DNA damage response during an unperturbed S-phase.
Ben-Yehoyada M; Gautier J; Dupré A
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):914-22. PubMed ID: 17374515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints.
Nyberg KA; Michelson RJ; Putnam CW; Weinert TA
Annu Rev Genet; 2002; 36():617-56. PubMed ID: 12429704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.
Lambert S; Carr AM
Biochimie; 2005 Jul; 87(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 15989976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
