BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19505909)

  • 1. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes.
    Boyd N; Martin L; Gunasekara A; Melnichouk O; Maudsley G; Peressotti C; Yaffe M; Minkin S
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Jun; 18(6):1754-62. PubMed ID: 19505909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods.
    Aitken Z; McCormack VA; Highnam RP; Martin L; Gunasekara A; Melnichouk O; Mawdsley G; Peressotti C; Yaffe M; Boyd NF; dos Santos Silva I
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Feb; 19(2):418-28. PubMed ID: 20142240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views.
    Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):551-4. PubMed ID: 20544272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semi-automated and fully automated mammographic density measurement and breast cancer risk prediction.
    Llobet R; Pollán M; Antón J; Miranda-García J; Casals M; Martínez I; Ruiz-Perales F; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Pérez-Cortés JC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24636804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nondense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer.
    Pettersson A; Hankinson SE; Willett WC; Lagiou P; Trichopoulos D; Tamimi RM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2011 Oct; 13(5):R100. PubMed ID: 22017857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An automated approach for estimation of breast density.
    Heine JJ; Carston MJ; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Wu FF; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA; Vachon CM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Nov; 17(11):3090-7. PubMed ID: 18990749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women.
    Kotsuma Y; Tamaki Y; Nishimura T; Tsubai M; Ueda S; Shimazu K; Jin Kim S; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S
    Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17716895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements.
    Heine JJ; Fowler EE; Flowers CI
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1430-6. PubMed ID: 21971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell EK; Little LE; Miller AB; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Yaffe MJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 May; 87(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7752271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
    Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel automated mammographic density measure and breast cancer risk.
    Heine JJ; Scott CG; Sellers TA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Schueler BA; Couch FJ; Olson JE; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jul; 104(13):1028-37. PubMed ID: 22761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density.
    Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell E; Lockwood GA; Little LE; Tritchler DL
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():S47-55. PubMed ID: 10866036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer.
    Cheddad A; Czene K; Eriksson M; Li J; Easton D; Hall P; Humphreys K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110690. PubMed ID: 25329322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to the time since the mammogram.
    Yaghjyan L; Colditz GA; Rosner B; Tamimi RM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Jun; 22(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 23603205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.
    Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1629-38. PubMed ID: 15551535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.