These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19505940)

  • 1. Identifying the topology of protein complexes from affinity purification assays.
    Friedel CC; Zimmer R
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(16):2140-6. PubMed ID: 19505940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Popular computational methods to assess multiprotein complexes derived from label-free affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP-MS) experiments.
    Armean IM; Lilley KS; Trotter MW
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Jan; 12(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 23071097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ProCope--protein complex prediction and evaluation.
    Krumsiek J; Friedel CC; Zimmer R
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 24(18):2115-6. PubMed ID: 18635566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Type-2 fuzzy data fusion approach for building reliable weighted protein interaction networks with application in protein complex detection.
    Mehranfar A; Ghadiri N; Kouhsar M; Golshani A
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Sep; 88():18-31. PubMed ID: 28672176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From Function to Interaction: A New Paradigm for Accurately Predicting Protein Complexes Based on Protein-to-Protein Interaction Networks.
    Xu B; Guan J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2014; 11(4):616-27. PubMed ID: 26356332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferring physical protein contacts from large-scale purification data of protein complexes.
    Schelhorn SE; Mestre J; Albrecht M; Zotenko E
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Jun; 10(6):M110.004929. PubMed ID: 21451165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational detection of protein complexes in AP-MS experiments.
    Choi H
    Proteomics; 2012 May; 12(10):1663-8. PubMed ID: 22711593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting co-complexed protein pairs from heterogeneous data.
    Qiu J; Noble WS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Apr; 4(4):e1000054. PubMed ID: 18421371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein complex prediction via verifying and reconstructing the topology of domain-domain interactions.
    Ozawa Y; Saito R; Fujimori S; Kashima H; Ishizaka M; Yanagawa H; Miyamoto-Sato E; Tomita M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 11():350. PubMed ID: 20584269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Large-scale mapping of human protein interactome using structural complexes.
    Tyagi M; Hashimoto K; Shoemaker BA; Wuchty S; Panchenko AR
    EMBO Rep; 2012 Mar; 13(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 22261719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel scoring approach for protein co-purification data reveals high interaction specificity.
    Yu X; Ivanic J; Wallqvist A; Reifman J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Sep; 5(9):e1000515. PubMed ID: 19779545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Homogeneous decomposition of protein interaction networks: refining the description of intra-modular interactions.
    Del Mondo G; Eveillard D; Rusu I
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 25(7):926-32. PubMed ID: 19223451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying components of complexes.
    Goffard N; Weiller G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 453():257-65. PubMed ID: 18712308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A density-based clustering approach for identifying overlapping protein complexes with functional preferences.
    Hu L; Chan KC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():174. PubMed ID: 26013799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interwinding nature of protein-protein interfaces and its implication for protein complex formation.
    Yura K; Hayward S
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 25(23):3108-13. PubMed ID: 19789269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discovery of protein complexes with core-attachment structures from Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP) data.
    Wu M; Li XL; Kwoh CK; Ng SK; Wong L
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):1027-42. PubMed ID: 21777084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Specificity and affinity quantification of protein-protein interactions.
    Yan Z; Guo L; Hu L; Wang J
    Bioinformatics; 2013 May; 29(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 23476023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enumeration of condition-dependent dense modules in protein interaction networks.
    Georgii E; Dietmann S; Uno T; Pagel P; Tsuda K
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 25(7):933-40. PubMed ID: 19213739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of protein complexes from affinity purification/mass spectrometry data.
    Cai B; Wang H; Zheng H; Wang H
    BMC Syst Biol; 2012; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. PubMed ID: 23282282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new multi-scale method to reveal hierarchical modular structures in biological networks.
    Jiao QJ; Huang Y; Shen HB
    Mol Biosyst; 2016 Nov; 12(12):3724-3733. PubMed ID: 27783080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.