165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19505964)
1. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis--a feasibility study.
Carton AK; Gavenonis SC; Currivan JA; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
Br J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 83(988):344-50. PubMed ID: 19505964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model.
Hu YH; Scaduto DA; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28044312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of contrast agent kinetics between iodinated contrast-enhanced spectral tomosynthesis and gadolinium-enhanced MRI of breast lesions.
Froeling V; Diekmann F; Renz DM; Fallenberg EM; Steffen IG; Diekmann S; Lawaczeck R; Schmitzberger FF
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1528-36. PubMed ID: 23306708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.
Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Heerdt AS; Thornton C; Moskowitz CS; Ferrara J; Morris EA
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23220903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A feasibility study on deep-neural-network-based dose-neutral dual-energy digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee H; Lee S; Choi YW; Choi YJ; Kim KH; Seo W; Shin CW; Cho S
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):791-807. PubMed ID: 36273397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-energy subtraction mammography.
Asaga T; Masuzawa C; Yoshida A; Matsuura H
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):70-3. PubMed ID: 7734544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality.
Samei E; Saunders RS
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6359-78. PubMed ID: 21908902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: I. A theoretical model.
Carton AK; Ullberg C; Lindman K; Acciavatti R; Francke T; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5896-907. PubMed ID: 21158302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosythesis and breast MRI to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: patient tolerance and preference.
Savaridas SL; Whelehan P; Warwick VR; Vinnicombe SJ; Evans AJ
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20210779. PubMed ID: 35143334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility.
Lewin JM; Isaacs PK; Vance V; Larke FJ
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):261-8. PubMed ID: 12888621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: II. An experimental validation.
Carton AK; Ullberg C; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5908-13. PubMed ID: 21158303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.
Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental characterization of a direct conversion amorphous selenium detector with thicker conversion layer for dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast imaging.
Scaduto DA; Tousignant O; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3965-3977. PubMed ID: 28543761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
