161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19506203)
1. Retinopathy of prematurity malpractice claims.
Mills MD
Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 127(6):803-4. PubMed ID: 19506203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Retinopathy of prematurity malpractice claims: the Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company experience.
Day S; Menke AM; Abbott RL
Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 127(6):794-8. PubMed ID: 19506200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Socioeconomics of retinopathy of prematurity in-hospital care.
Braverman RS; Enzenauer RW
Arch Ophthalmol; 2010 Aug; 128(8):1055-8. PubMed ID: 20697008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retinopathy of prematurity requires diligent follow-up care.
Demorest BH
Surv Ophthalmol; 1996; 41(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 8890444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiology and medical malpractice claims: a report on the practice standards claims survey of the Physician Insurers Association of America and the American College of Radiology.
Brenner RJ; Lucey LL; Smith JJ; Saunders R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 9648756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retinopathy of prematurity: A refresher for obstetricians.
Oleszczuk AK; Zagorski Z; Stankiewicz A; Mankowska A; Rejdak R; Oleszczuk JJ
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2006; 51(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16881385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Seven hundred medicolegal cases in ophthalmology.
Bettman JW
Ophthalmology; 1990 Oct; 97(10):1379-84. PubMed ID: 2243691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retinopathy of prematurity: keeping the status quo. A case series detailing the importance of keeping the current guidelines for screening.
Durnian JM; Clark DI
Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 94(12):1693-4. PubMed ID: 20584715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Twenty-five years of professional liability in pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus: the OMIC experience.
Wiggins RE; Gold RS; Menke AM
J AAPOS; 2015 Dec; 19(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 26691033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of state legislation regarding professional liability.
Demorest BH
Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1253-63. PubMed ID: 233858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preventing claims in outpatient care environments.
Trosty RS
Mich Med; 1998 Jun; 97(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 9640945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Changing the status quo bias.
Khan KN; Ali M; Toomes C; Inglehearn CF; Bradbury J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jul; 95(7):1034. PubMed ID: 21242578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. MMIE malpractice claim review. Family practice clinic. MMIE Risk Management Committee.
Sanders PS
Minn Med; 1986 Dec; 69(12):741. PubMed ID: 3807868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Socioeconomics of retinopathy of prematurity care in the United States.
Braverman RS; Enzenauer RW
Am Orthopt J; 2013; 63():92-6. PubMed ID: 24141758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ADR (alternative dispute resolution) mechanisms for medical liability claims: an overview of state and federal proposals.
Hatlie MJ; Johnson ID
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Oct; 78(10):20-4. PubMed ID: 10128947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A view on the guidelines for management of retinopathy of prematurity.
Aclimandos WA
Early Hum Dev; 2005 Apr; 81(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 15814225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A year in review--legal developments and trends.
Loomis C
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2003 Dec; 96(12):585-7. PubMed ID: 14965031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical malpractice in the State of Hawaii (1979-1984).
Mardfin JK
Hawaii Med J; 1987 Jan; 46(1):19, 22-3. PubMed ID: 3557953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacious or precarious? Comments on the processing and resolution of medical malpractice claims in the United States.
Meschievitz CS
Ann Health Law; 1994; 3():123-38. PubMed ID: 10139974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NYSDA district claims process wins key court battle.
Plunkett L
N Y State Dent J; 2010 Apr; 76(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 20533710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
