These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1950634)

  • 1. Semantic processing of unattended parafoveal words.
    Di Pace E; Longoni AM; Zoccolotti P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1991 Aug; 77(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 1950634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parafoveal visual information and semantic contextual constraints.
    Balota DA; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Oct; 9(5):726-38. PubMed ID: 6227686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Bentin S; Kutas M; Hillyard SA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Feb; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 7707033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements.
    Angele B; Tran R; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 22866764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of the Anterior Attention System in Semantic Processing of both Foveal and Parafoveal Words.
    Fuentes LJ; Carmona E; Agis IF; Catena A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1994; 6(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23962327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic word priming in the absence of eye fixations: relative contributions of overt and covert attention.
    Calvo MG; Castillo MD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 19145009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Foveal vs. parafoveal attention-grabbing power of threat-related information.
    Calvo MG; Castillo MD
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 15850162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals.
    Altarriba J; Kambe G; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):875-90. PubMed ID: 11521853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kouchi S; Lachter J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.
    Fuentes LJ; Ortells JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1993 Dec; 84(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 8128904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing of threat-related information outside the focus of visual attention.
    Calvo MG; Castillo MD
    Span J Psychol; 2005 May; 8(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15875452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential cognitive processing of Kanji and Kana words: do orthographic and semantic codes function in parallel in word matching task.
    Kawakami A; Hatta T; Kogure T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Dec; 93(3):719-26. PubMed ID: 11806593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parafoveal word perception: a further case against semantic preprocessing.
    Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 6460079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A left visual field bias for semantic encoding of unattended words.
    Lambert A; Voot N
    Neuropsychologia; 1993 Jan; 31(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8437683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects and preview benefits in reading: Evidence from Fixation Related Potentials.
    López-Peréz PJ; Dampuré J; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Barber HA
    Brain Lang; 2016 Nov; 162():29-34. PubMed ID: 27513878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
    Lee CH; Kim K
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related potentials show that parafoveal vision is insufficient for semantic integration.
    Schotter ER; Milligan S; Estevez VM
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Jul; 60(7):e14246. PubMed ID: 36811523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parafoveal words are effective in both hemifields: preattentive processing of semantic and phonological codes.
    Underwood G; Rusted J; Thwaites S
    Perception; 1983; 12(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 6657427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.