These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19506412)

  • 1. Tubeless and stentless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients requiring supracostal access.
    Gonen M; Cicek T; Ozkardes H
    Urol Int; 2009; 82(4):440-3. PubMed ID: 19506412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports.
    Shah HN; Kausik VB; Hegde SS; Shah JN; Bansal MB
    BJU Int; 2005 Oct; 96(6):879-83. PubMed ID: 16153222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Shah HN; Kausik VB; Hegde SS; Shah JN; Bansal MB
    Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):500-4. PubMed ID: 16140065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 3 years of experience with 454 patients.
    Shah H; Khandkar A; Sodha H; Kharodawala S; Hegde S; Bansal M
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):840-6. PubMed ID: 19338561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Shah HN; Hegde SS; Shah JN; Bansal MB
    J Endourol; 2006 Dec; 20(12):1016-21. PubMed ID: 17206894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL.
    Mishra S; Sabnis RB; Kurien A; Ganpule A; Muthu V; Desai M
    BJU Int; 2010 Oct; 106(7):1045-8; discussion 1048-9. PubMed ID: 20151965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supracostal access: does it affect tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy efficacy and safety?
    Jun-Ou J; Lojanapiwat B
    Int Braz J Urol; 2010; 36(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 20450501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extending the application of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Sofer M; Beri A; Friedman A; Aviram G; Mabjeesh NJ; Chen J; Ben-Chaim J; Greenstein A; Matzkin H
    Urology; 2007 Sep; 70(3):412-6; discussion 416-7. PubMed ID: 17905084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy--the new standard of care?
    Zilberman DE; Lipkin ME; de la Rosette JJ; Ferrandino MN; Mamoulakis C; Laguna MP; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1261-6. PubMed ID: 20723920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: nephrostomy or tubeless or totally tubeless?
    Istanbulluoglu MO; Cicek T; Ozturk B; Gonen M; Ozkardes H
    Urology; 2010 May; 75(5):1043-6. PubMed ID: 19854490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of fibrin sealant in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Shah HN; Hegde S; Shah JN; Mohile PD; Yuvaraja TB; Bansal MB
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2488-92; discussion 2492-3. PubMed ID: 17085137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: outcomes with expanded indications.
    Isac W; Rizkala E; Liu X; Noble M; Monga M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 24856487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: first 200 cases in Israel.
    Sofer M; Lidawi G; Keren-Paz G; Yehiely R; Beri A; Matzkin H
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Mar; 12(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 20684181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized comparison of totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients.
    Kara C; Resorlu B; Bayindir M; Unsal A
    Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 20299077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fibrin sealant enables tubeless percutaneous stone surgery.
    Noller MW; Baughman SM; Morey AF; Auge BK
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):166-9. PubMed ID: 15201763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of nephrostomy drainage types following percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring multiple tracts: single tube versus multiple tubes versus tubeless.
    Resorlu B; Kara C; Sahin E; Unsal A
    Urol Int; 2011; 87(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 21720147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized comparison of tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Agrawal MS; Agrawal M; Gupta A; Bansal S; Yadav A; Goyal J
    J Endourol; 2008 Mar; 22(3):439-42. PubMed ID: 18257738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nephrostomy tube placement after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: critical evaluation through a prospective randomized study.
    Shoma AM; Elshal AM
    Urology; 2012 Apr; 79(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 22130359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supracostal tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Duty B; Conlin M; Wagner M; Bayne A; Adams G; Fuchs E
    J Endourol; 2013 Mar; 27(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 22973820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery.
    Munver R; Delvecchio FC; Newman GE; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1242-6. PubMed ID: 11547050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.