242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19506919)
1. Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
Berg S; Tullberg T; Branth B; Olerud C; Tropp H
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1512-9. PubMed ID: 19506919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex life and sexual function in men and women before and after total disc replacement compared with posterior lumbar fusion.
Berg S; Fritzell P; Tropp H
Spine J; 2009 Dec; 9(12):987-94. PubMed ID: 19819762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Five-year follow-up of total disc replacement compared to fusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Sköld C; Tropp H; Berg S
Eur Spine J; 2013 Oct; 22(10):2288-95. PubMed ID: 23893083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On total disc replacement.
Berg S
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2011 Feb; 82(343):1-29. PubMed ID: 21542779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of sagittal spinal balance, levels of posterior instrumentation, and length of follow-up on low back pain in patients undergoing posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a multifactorial analysis.
Korovessis P; Repantis T; Papazisis Z; Iliopoulos P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):898-905. PubMed ID: 20354466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up.
Jackson RJ; Davis RJ; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Hisey MS; Kim KD; Gaede SE; Nunley PD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):734-45. PubMed ID: 26799118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C
Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disc height and motion patterns in the lumbar spine in patients operated with total disc replacement or fusion for discogenic back pain. Results from a randomized controlled trial.
Berg S; Tropp HT; Leivseth G
Spine J; 2011 Nov; 11(11):991-8. PubMed ID: 21978518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postoperative posterior lumbar muscle changes and their relationship to segmental motion preservation or restriction: a randomized prospective study.
Strube P; Putzier M; Streitparth F; Hoff EK; Hartwig T
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 26360146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical outcome of the Charité III total lumbar disc replacement.
Kitzen J; Schotanus MGM; van Kuijk SMJ; Jutten EMC; Kort NP; van Rhijn LW; Willems PC
Eur Spine J; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1527-1535. PubMed ID: 31993792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Success of lumbar microdiscectomy in patients with modic changes and low-back pain: a prospective pilot study.
Chin KR; Tomlinson DT; Auerbach JD; Shatsky JB; Deirmengian CA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 18391720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of single-level L4-L5 versus L5-S1 lumbar disc replacement: results and prognostic factors.
Sinigaglia R; Bundy A; Costantini S; Nena U; Finocchiaro F; Monterumici DA
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):52-63. PubMed ID: 19404688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
Pimenta L; Oliveira L; Schaffa T; Coutinho E; Marchi L
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21166491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature.
van den Eerenbeemt KD; Ostelo RW; van Royen BJ; Peul WC; van Tulder MW
Eur Spine J; 2010 Aug; 19(8):1262-80. PubMed ID: 20508954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-level total lumbar disc replacement.
Di Silvestre M; Bakaloudis G; Lolli F; Vommaro F; Parisini P
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):64-70. PubMed ID: 19399536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facet Arthropathy Following Disc Replacement Versus Rehabilitation: A Prospective Study With 8-Year Follow-Up.
Furunes H; Berg L; Espeland A; Thoresen H; Neckelmann G; Brøgger HM; Småstuen MC; Brox JI; Storheim K; Hellum C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(21):1467-1475. PubMed ID: 32694494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.
Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
