These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1950721)

  • 1. IUDs and PID: a comparative trial of strings versus stringless devices.
    Potts DM; Champion CB; Kozuh-Novak M; Alvarez-Sanchez F; Santiso-Galvez R; Tacla X; Cohen J; Rivera R
    Adv Contracept; 1991; 7(2-3):231-40. PubMed ID: 1950721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current status of intrauterine devices. II. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy.
    Malhotra N; Chaudhury RR
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1982 Jan; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7054735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A reanalysis of the Cu-7 intrauterine contraceptive device clinical trial and the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease: a paradigm for assessing intrauterine contraceptive device safety.
    Roy S; Azen C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1606-13; discussion 1613-6. PubMed ID: 8203417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective.
    Farley TM; Rosenberg MJ; Rowe PJ; Chen JH; Meirik O
    Lancet; 1992 Mar; 339(8796):785-8. PubMed ID: 1347812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of the TCu200B with and without strings.
    Galvez RS; Galich L; Guirola AM; Cole LP; Waszak C
    Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1985; (1):107-12. PubMed ID: 12267105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low risk of pelvic inflammatory disease in young never-pregnant women using Gravigard.
    Larsson B; Hagström B; Viberg L; Anker C; Hamberger L; Lindhe BA
    Contraception; 1979 Sep; 20(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 509955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence against tailstrings increasing the rate of pelvic inflammatory disease among IUD users.
    Ebi KL; Piziali RL; Rosenberg M; Wachob HF
    Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 8631186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the delta copper T and the copper T 200 in Bologna, Italy.
    Melega C; Biscontin S; Canedi L; Marchesini FP; Tirelli S; Bartolotti T; Flamigni C
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1986; 17(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 3727892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary report on a postpartum CuT 200 study, Santiago, Chile.
    Lavin P; Waszak C; Bravo C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Feb; 21(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 6133798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of a copper intra-uterine contraceptive device on the microbial ecology of the female genital tract.
    Elhag KM; Bahar AM; Mubarak AA
    J Med Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 25(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 3357191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrauterine contraceptive device and pelvic inflammatory disease.
    Toivonen J
    Ann Med; 1993 Apr; 25(2):171-3. PubMed ID: 8489756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The intrauterine device in the present and future.
    Rivera R; Chi IC; Farr G
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 5(6):829-32. PubMed ID: 8286697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
    Chi IC
    Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil.
    Lassner KJ; Chen CH; Kropsch LA; Oberle MW; Lopes IM; Morris L
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1995 Sep; 29(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 8520606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.
    Mumford SD; Kessel E
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pelvic inflammatory disease and the intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Wright EA; Aisien AO
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Feb; 28(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2563699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop IUDs in three developing countries.
    Farr G; Amatya R; Acosta M; Ekwempu C; Kisninci H
    Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8521710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease in clinical trials with Cu-7 (intrauterine copper contraceptive): a statistical analysis.
    O'Brien FB; Stewart WC; Sturtevant FM
    Contraception; 1983 Feb; 27(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 6851553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand.
    Reinprayoon D; Gilmore C; Farr G; Amatya R
    Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9865999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.