These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19507456)

  • 1. Use of tablet personal computers for sensitive patient-reported information.
    Dupont A; Wheeler J; Herndon JE; Coan A; Zafar SY; Hood L; Patwardhan M; Shaw HS; Lyerly HK; Abernethy AP
    J Support Oncol; 2009; 7(3):91-7. PubMed ID: 19507456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility and acceptability to patients of a longitudinal system for evaluating cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: pilot study of an e/Tablet data-collection system in academic oncology.
    Abernethy AP; Herndon JE; Wheeler JL; Day JM; Hood L; Patwardhan M; Shaw H; Lyerly HK
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2009 Jun; 37(6):1027-38. PubMed ID: 19394793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: an exploratory study.
    Gil KM; Frasure HE; Hopkins MP; Jenison EL; von Gruenigen VE
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Jan; 3():6. PubMed ID: 15655074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronic pain diary: a randomized crossover study.
    Gaertner J; Elsner F; Pollmann-Dahmen K; Radbruch L; Sabatowski R
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2004 Sep; 28(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 15336338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients may respond differently to paper and electronic versions of the same questionnaires.
    Juniper EF; Langlands JM; Juniper BA
    Respir Med; 2009 Jun; 103(6):932-4. PubMed ID: 19028085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic diaries as a tool to improve pain management: is there any evidence?
    Marceau LD; Link C; Jamison RN; Carolan S
    Pain Med; 2007 Oct; 8 Suppl 3():S101-9. PubMed ID: 17877520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care.
    Abernethy AP; Ahmad A; Zafar SY; Wheeler JL; Reese JB; Lyerly HK
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S32-8. PubMed ID: 20473201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic source materials in clinical research: acceptability and validity of symptom self-rating in major depressive disorder.
    Cook IA; Balasubramani GK; Eng H; Friedman E; Young EA; Martin J; Nay WT; Ritz L; Rush AJ; Stegman D; Warden D; Trivedi MH; Wisniewski SR
    J Psychiatr Res; 2007 Nov; 41(9):737-43. PubMed ID: 17275840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience.
    Denton IC
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2001; 15(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 11642143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Haemoassist--a hand-held electronic patient diary for haemophilia home care.
    Mondorf W; Siegmund B; Mahnel R; Richter H; Westfeld M; Galler A; Pollmann H
    Haemophilia; 2009 Mar; 15(2):464-72. PubMed ID: 19226411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires.
    Richter JG; Becker A; Koch T; Nixdorf M; Willers R; Monser R; Schacher B; Alten R; Specker C; Schneider M
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2008 Dec; 67(12):1739-41. PubMed ID: 18647853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What are patients really telling us? Comparison of survey responses and the medical record in cardiovascular surgical patients.
    Brown ML; Quinonez LG; Schaff HV; Sundt TM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 86(6):1888-96. PubMed ID: 19022004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of electronic urinary incontinence questionnaires.
    Straus SE; Holroyd-Leduc J; Orr MS
    Can J Urol; 2010 Jun; 17(3):5195-9. PubMed ID: 20566013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shared medical information: expectations of breast cancer patients.
    Milliat-Guittard L; Charlois AL; Letrilliart L; Favrel V; Galand-Desme S; Schott AM; Berthoux N; Chapet O; Mere P; Colin C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 17825392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and development of a mobile computer application to reengineer workflows in the hospital and the methodology to evaluate its effectiveness.
    Holzinger A; Kosec P; Schwantzer G; Debevc M; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Frühauf J
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Dec; 44(6):968-77. PubMed ID: 21854873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data.
    Abernethy AP; Herndon JE; Wheeler JL; Patwardhan M; Shaw H; Lyerly HK; Weinfurt K
    Health Serv Res; 2008 Dec; 43(6):1975-91. PubMed ID: 18761678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation study of an electronic method of condensed outcomes tools reporting in orthopaedics.
    Farr J; Verma N; Cole BJ
    J Knee Surg; 2013 Dec; 26(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 23729311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two methods to transmit clinical history information from referring providers to radiologists.
    Agarwal R; Bleshman MH; Langlotz CP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Nov; 6(11):795-9. PubMed ID: 19878887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of electronic resident evaluation systems on the timeliness, rate, and quality of responses. Survey of Association of Program Directors in Radiology members.
    Boiselle PM; Mainiero MB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Oct; 3(10):807-11. PubMed ID: 17412172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of computer-based and personal interviews for the gynecologic history update.
    Hasley S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 7898822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.