568 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19507603)
1. [Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].
Chen Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY; Liu W; Sun H; Wang X; Zhao WM; Wang Y; Mu WB
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 19507603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-energy CTA with bone removal for transcranial arteries: intraindividual comparison with standard CTA without bone removal and TOF-MRA.
Buerke B; Wittkamp G; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Kloska SP
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1348-55. PubMed ID: 19608437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone subtraction CTA for transcranial arteries: intra-individual comparison with standard CTA without bone subtraction and TOF-MRA.
Buerke B; Puesken M; Wittkamp G; Stehling C; Ditt H; Seidensticker P; Wessling J; Heindel W; Kloska SP
Clin Radiol; 2010 Jun; 65(6):440-6. PubMed ID: 20451010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time.
Greve T; Sollmann N; Hock A; Hey S; Gnanaprakasam V; Nijenhuis M; Zimmer C; Kirschke JS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):855-865. PubMed ID: 31664504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cerebral artery evaluation of dual energy CT angiography with dual source CT.
Ma R; Liu C; Deng K; Song SJ; Wang DP; Huang L
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 May; 123(9):1139-44. PubMed ID: 20529552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Thomas C; Korn A; Ketelsen D; Danz S; Tsifikas I; Claussen CD; Ernemann U; Heuschmid M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1590-5. PubMed ID: 20489101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between 2 unenhanced MRAs and dual-source CTA.
Lv P; Lin J; Guo D; Liu H; Tang X; Fu C; Hu J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Dec; 35(12):2360-5. PubMed ID: 25104291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Bash S; Villablanca JP; Jahan R; Duckwiler G; Tillis M; Kidwell C; Saver J; Sayre J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005 May; 26(5):1012-21. PubMed ID: 15891154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of dual-energy bone removal in CT angiography of the head and neck: comparison with conventional bone-subtraction CT angiography.
Deng K; Liu C; Ma R; Sun C; Wang XM; Ma ZT; Sun XL
Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 19348851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual energy CTA of the carotid bifurcation: advantage of plaque subtraction for assessment of grade of the stenosis and morphology.
Korn A; Bender B; Thomas C; Danz S; Fenchel M; Nägele T; Heuschmid M; Ernemann U; Hauser TK
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e120-5. PubMed ID: 20833492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing.
Lell M; Fellner C; Baum U; Hothorn T; Steiner R; Lang W; Bautz W; Fellner FA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 17213434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated subtraction CT angiography for visualization of the whole brain vasculature: a feasibility study.
Li Q; Lv F; Wei Y; Luo T; Xie P
Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):1009-14. PubMed ID: 23746383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved imaging of carotid artery bifurcation using helical computed tomographic angiography.
Cinat ME; Pham H; Vo D; Gordon I; Wilson SE
Ann Vasc Surg; 1999 Mar; 13(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 10072458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Uotani K; Watanabe Y; Higashi M; Nakazawa T; Kono AK; Hori Y; Fukuda T; Kanzaki S; Yamada N; Itoh T; Sugimura K; Naito H
Eur Radiol; 2009 Aug; 19(8):2060-5. PubMed ID: 19277672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
