569 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19507603)
21. [The significance of MR angiography for the diagnosis of carotid stenoses].
Michaely HJ; Herrmann KA; Kramer H; Laub G; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Radiologe; 2004 Oct; 44(10):975-84. PubMed ID: 15549221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Highly accelerated compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography may be reliable for diagnosing head and neck arterial steno-occlusive disease: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.
Zhang X; Cao YZ; Mu XH; Sun Y; Schmidt M; Forman C; Speier P; Lu SS; Hong XN
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3059-3065. PubMed ID: 32064562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with three-dimensional CT angiography and surgical revascularization].
Ohtaki M; Tanabe S; Uede T; Hashi K
No Shinkei Geka; 1996 Nov; 24(11):995-1002. PubMed ID: 8934467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Mannil M; Ramachandran J; Vittoria de Martini I; Wegener S; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Krauss B; Valavanis A; Alkadhi H; Winklhofer S
Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating non-invasive medical imaging for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
Lu X; Zhang W; Gui Q; Yu M; Guo Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jan; 116(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 12667401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of Symptomatic Carotid Plaque Using Source Data from MR and CT Angiography: A Correlative Study.
Gupta A; Baradaran H; Mtui EE; Kamel H; Pandya A; Giambrone A; Iadecola C; Sanelli PC
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015; 39(3-4):151-61. PubMed ID: 25721945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Initial experience with helical CT and 3D reconstruction in therapeutic planning of cerebral AVMs: comparison with 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Tanaka H; Numaguchi Y; Konno S; Shrier DA; Shibata DK; Patel U
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):811-7. PubMed ID: 9294581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Spiral CT angiography versus DSA in detection of carotid stenoses].
Link J; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Wesner F; Steffens JC; Brossmann J; Heller M
Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1018-22. PubMed ID: 9092221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
Remonda L; Heid O; Schroth G
Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High resolution, magnetization transfer saturation, variable flip angle, time-of-flight MRA in the detection of intracranial vascular stenoses.
Dagirmanjian A; Ross JS; Obuchowski N; Lewin JS; Tkach JA; Ruggieri PM; Masaryk TJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 7560313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of 7.0- and 3.0-T MRI and MRA in ischemic-type moyamoya disease: preliminary experience.
Deng X; Zhang Z; Zhang Y; Zhang D; Wang R; Ye X; Xu L; Wang B; Wang K; Zhao J
J Neurosurg; 2016 Jun; 124(6):1716-25. PubMed ID: 26544772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Spiral CT angiography in stenoses of the middle cerebral artery].
Lehmann KJ; Neff KW; Ries S; Sommer A; Steinke W; Georgi M
Radiologe; 1996 Nov; 36(11):845-9. PubMed ID: 9036424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.
Marks MP; Napel S; Jordan JE; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 8498231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in grading of carotid artery stenosis in comparison with actual measurement in an in vitro model.
Smith JC; Watkins GE; Smith DC; Palmer EW; Abou-Zamzam AM; Zhao CX; Zhang WW
Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 26(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 22285345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.
Silvennoinen HM; Ikonen S; Soinne L; Railo M; Valanne L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17213433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cranial computed tomography angiography with automated bone subtraction: a feasibility study.
Lell MM; Ruehm SG; Kramer M; Panknin C; Habibi R; Klotz E; Villablanca P
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jan; 44(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18836384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Non-invasive assessment of epiaortic vessels. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography with gadolinium, spiral computerized tomography angiography, and digital angiography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Pocek M; Fasoli F; Garaci FG; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):48-53. PubMed ID: 11360753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
