564 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19507922)
21. Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction Act: a chimera of religion and politics.
Morris SG
Am J Bioeth; 2007 Feb; 7(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 17366203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A retreat from reason? The Catholic church and scientific progress.
Potts M
Conscience; 2003; 24(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16459384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cloning for human reproduction: one American perspective.
Chester R
Syd Law Rev; 2001 Sep; 23(3):319-46. PubMed ID: 15080116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Catholic teaching and the law concerning the new reproductive technologies.
Alvare HM
Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):107-34. PubMed ID: 15868664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Human reproductive technologies and the law: a select committee report.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
Bull Med Ethics; 2005 May; (208):13-21. PubMed ID: 17115496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning.
United Nations. General Assembly
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(2):357-8. PubMed ID: 16170888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. What is an embryo?
Kiessling AA
Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1051-92. PubMed ID: 15868674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Multifetal pregnancy reduction in assisted reproductive technologies: a license to kill?
Khanijou S
DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(2):403-30. PubMed ID: 16538758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Against so-called embryo reduction.
Centre of Bioethics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome
Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Apr; (127):8-9. PubMed ID: 16127838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Assisted reproductive technology: perspectives in Halakha (Jewish religious law).
Schenker JG
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008; 17 Suppl 3():17-24. PubMed ID: 18983733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A crime against humanity.
Trounson A
New Sci; 2003 Nov 22-28; 180(2422):23. PubMed ID: 15015506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Regulation of reproductive medicine in North America or the Wild West of Medicine (Part II)].
Alkorta Idiakez I
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):41-89. PubMed ID: 15032098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Politics, prohibitions and the lost public perspective: a comment on Bill C-56: the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.
Caulfield T
Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):451-63. PubMed ID: 16211737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
Bowens KK
J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spanish regulations on assisted reproduction techniques.
Boada M; Veiga A; Barri PN
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2003 Jul; 20(7):271-5. PubMed ID: 12921266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [The 14/2006 law on human assisted reproduction techniques: scientific and ethical considerations].
Lacadena JR
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2006; (24):157-84. PubMed ID: 17124975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. European Parliament on genetics.
European Parliament
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Apr; No. 57():8-10. PubMed ID: 11659240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The pathos of the Kass report.
Berkowitz P
Policy Rev; 2002; 115():1-7. PubMed ID: 17256231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Challenges of the new biotechnology.
Charlesworth M
Australas Cathol Rec; 1989 Jan; 66(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16998987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Nuclear transfer cloning and the United Nations.
Perry AC
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1506-8. PubMed ID: 15583651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
