These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19507973)

  • 1. Effects of center frequency and rate on the sensitivity to interaural delay in high-frequency click trains.
    Majdak P; Laback B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3903-13. PubMed ID: 19507973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):808-16. PubMed ID: 25234889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing.
    Laback B; Majdak P; Baumgartner WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2182-91. PubMed ID: 17471732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural time differences at high modulation rates by introducing temporal jitter.
    Goupell MJ; Laback B; Majdak P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2511-21. PubMed ID: 19894831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps.
    Buck AN; Buchholz S; Schnupp JW; Rosskothen-Kuhl N
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3785. PubMed ID: 36882473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.
    Francart T; Wiebe K; Wesarg T
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 19(6):703-715. PubMed ID: 30264229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 18367697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; McAlpine D; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1862. PubMed ID: 28372072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.
    Goupell MJ; Fong S; Stakhovskaya O
    Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():117-127. PubMed ID: 31154164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.
    Poon BB; Eddington DK; Noel V; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):806-15. PubMed ID: 19640045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.
    Joris PX
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct; 76(4):2137-56. PubMed ID: 8899590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones, two-tone complexes, and bands of noise.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 8046145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation.
    van Hoesel RJ; Jones GL; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 10(4):557-67. PubMed ID: 19513792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
    Vollmer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 17(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26377826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences.
    Brown CA; Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL358-64. PubMed ID: 22088041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.