These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19507973)

  • 21. Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):306-16. PubMed ID: 1737879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mixed stimulation rates to improve sensitivity of interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
    Thakkar T; Kan A; Jones HG; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1428. PubMed ID: 29604701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Limitations on rate discrimination.
    Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1009-25. PubMed ID: 12243150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to interaural time differences in the envelope versus the fine structure with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Smith ZM; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 99(5):2390-407. PubMed ID: 18287556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
    Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2338. PubMed ID: 28464641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Unanesthetized Rabbits.
    Chung Y; Hancock KE; Delgutte B
    J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(20):5520-31. PubMed ID: 27194332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trading of interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains.
    Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):202-12. PubMed ID: 20547218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Schuchman GI; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765514. PubMed ID: 29623771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Temporal weighting of interaural time and level differences in high-rate click trains.
    Brown AD; Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):332-41. PubMed ID: 20649228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitivity to interaural time differences with combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.
    Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Mar; 10(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 19048344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing.
    Majdak P; Laback B; Baumgartner WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2190-201. PubMed ID: 17069315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.
    Whiteford KL; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3093-104. PubMed ID: 26627783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neuronal sensitivity to interaural time differences in the sound envelope in the auditory cortex of the pallid bat.
    Lohuis TD; Fuzessery ZM
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):43-57. PubMed ID: 10771183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    van Hoesel RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2192-206. PubMed ID: 17471733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.
    McKay CM; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Binaural hearing in children using Gaussian enveloped and transposed tones.
    Ehlers E; Kan A; Winn MB; Stoelb C; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1724. PubMed ID: 27106319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.