These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19507973)

  • 61. Temporal pitch perception and the binaural system.
    Carlyon RP; Demany L; Deeks J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):686-700. PubMed ID: 11248973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Processing of interaural time and intensity differences in the cat inferior colliculus.
    Caird D; Klinke R
    Exp Brain Res; 1987; 68(2):379-92. PubMed ID: 3691710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).
    Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):611-4. PubMed ID: 22894182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3164. PubMed ID: 28599571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Improved Neural Coding of ITD with Bilateral Cochlear Implants by Introducing Short Inter-pulse Intervals.
    Buechel BD; Hancock KE; Chung Y; Delgutte B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 19(6):681-702. PubMed ID: 30191423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Spatial mapping of intracranial auditory events for various degrees of interaural coherence.
    Blauert J; Lindemann W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):806-13. PubMed ID: 3958323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Mapping lateralization of click trains in younger and older populations.
    Babkoff H; Muchnik C; Ben-David N; Furst M; Even-Zohar S; Hildesheimer M
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):117-27. PubMed ID: 12031521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Detection of the break in interaural correlation is affected by interaural delay, aging, and center frequency.
    Huang Y; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):300-9. PubMed ID: 19603886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A Computational Model for Evaluating Transient Auditory Storage of Acoustic Features in Normal Listeners.
    Zong N; Wu M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. How sensitivity to ongoing interaural temporal disparities is affected by manipulations of temporal features of the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3234-42. PubMed ID: 19425666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Release and re-buildup of listeners' models of auditory space.
    Keen R; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3243-52. PubMed ID: 19425667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A recency effect in sound localization?
    Stecker GC; Hafter ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3914-24. PubMed ID: 19507974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Rate dependent neural responses of interaural-time-difference cues in fine-structure and envelope.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B; Vickers D
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17104. PubMed ID: 38680894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Simulation of ITD-Dependent Single-Neuron Responses Under Electrical Stimulation and with Amplitude-Modulated Acoustic Stimuli.
    Hu H; Klug J; Dietz M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 23(4):535-550. PubMed ID: 35334001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Interaural-time-difference thresholds for broad band-limited pulses are affected by relative bandwidth not temporal envelope sharpness.
    Mayo PG; Saunders PC; Goupell MJ
    JASA Express Lett; 2021 Dec; 1(12):124401. PubMed ID: 34927162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Anderson SR; Easter K; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3232. PubMed ID: 31795662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.