These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19508451)

  • 41. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A model for the evolution of assortative mating.
    de Cara MA; Barton NH; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2008 May; 171(5):580-96. PubMed ID: 18419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Speciation accelerated and stabilized by pleiotropic major histocompatibility complex immunogenes.
    Eizaguirre C; Lenz TL; Traulsen A; Milinski M
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Jan; 12(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 19087108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sexual selection and the random union of gametes: testing for a correlation in fitness between mates in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Nov; 174(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 19757995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Genes and Group Membership Predict Gidgee Skink (Egernia stokesii) Reproductive Pairs.
    Pearson SK; Godfrey SS; Schwensow N; Bull CM; Gardner MG
    J Hered; 2017 Jun; 108(4):369-378. PubMed ID: 28407082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. MHC class I diversity predicts non-random mating in Chinese alligators (Alligator sinensis).
    Han QH; Sun RN; Yang HQ; Wang ZW; Wan QH; Fang SG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Jun; 122(6):809-818. PubMed ID: 30670843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of different mating scenarios on embryo viability in brown trout.
    Jacob A; Evanno G; Von Siebenthal BA; Grossen C; Wedekind C
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Dec; 19(23):5296-307. PubMed ID: 21040055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multiple paternity in a natural population of a wild tobacco fly, Bactrocera cacuminata (Diptera: Tephritidae), assessed by microsatellite DNA markers.
    Song SD; Drew RA; Hughes JM
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Jun; 16(11):2353-61. PubMed ID: 17561896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Male mate choice relies on major histocompatibility complex class I in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.
    Roth O; Sundin J; Berglund A; Rosenqvist G; Wegner KM
    J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):929-38. PubMed ID: 24725009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The role of infectious disease, inbreeding and mating preferences in maintaining MHC genetic diversity: an experimental test.
    Potts WK; Manning CJ; Wakeland EK
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1994 Nov; 346(1317):369-78. PubMed ID: 7708831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reproductive success and mate choice in Long-Evans rats.
    Zewail-Foote M; Diehl A; Benson A; Lee KH; Guarraci FA
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Jan; 96(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18824017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. No evidence for MHC class I-based disassortative mating in a wild population of great tits.
    Sepil I; Radersma R; Santure AW; De Cauwer I; Slate J; Sheldon BC
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 28(3):642-54. PubMed ID: 25661713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
    Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
    Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Mapping individual variation in male mating preference space: multiple choice in a color polymorphic cichlid fish.
    Pierotti ME; Martín-Fernández JA; Seehausen O
    Evolution; 2009 Sep; 63(9):2372-88. PubMed ID: 19473391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mate choice for major histocompatibility complex genetic divergence as a bet-hedging strategy in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Evans ML; Dionne M; Miller KM; Bernatchez L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jan; 279(1727):379-86. PubMed ID: 21697172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Demographic, environmental and genetic determinants of mating success in captive koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus).
    Abts KC; Ivy JA; DeWoody JA
    Zoo Biol; 2018 Nov; 37(6):416-433. PubMed ID: 30488502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Red and white Chinook salmon: genetic divergence and mate choice.
    Lehnert SJ; Pitcher TE; Devlin RH; Heath DD
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Mar; 25(6):1259-74. PubMed ID: 26836978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.