120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19509574)
1. Current hormone therapy associated with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women.
Ahn KH; Kim T; Kim YT; Lee KW; Kim SH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 May; 19(4):699-702. PubMed ID: 19509574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The positive predictive value of cervical smears in previously screened postmenopausal women: the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS).
Sawaya GF; Grady D; Kerlikowske K; Valleur JL; Barnabei VM; Bass K; Snyder TE; Pickar JH; Agarwal SK; Mandelblatt J
Ann Intern Med; 2000 Dec; 133(12):942-50. PubMed ID: 11119395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
Geier CS; Wilson M; Creasman W
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jan; 184(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 11174481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Keating JT; Wang HH
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11309774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expression of p16 INK4A in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from the uterine cervix.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 14529682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical squamous and glandular cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS and AGUS) of the uterine cervix.
Cenci M; Vecchione A
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3701-7. PubMed ID: 11268442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postmenopausal squamous-cell atypias: a diagnostic challenge.
Saminathan T; Lahoti C; Kannan V; Kline TS
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 7867464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytohormonal and morphological alterations in cervicovaginal smears of postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy.
Gupta S; Kumar N; Singhal N; Manektala U; Jain S; Sodhani P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Oct; 34(10):676-81. PubMed ID: 16955474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is p16(INK4A) expression more useful than human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smear? A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Lin YS; Fu E; Gau CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15790434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a laboratory audit of cervical reporting.
Roche DH; Spicer N
N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1126):64-6. PubMed ID: 11280428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "ASCUS, rule out HSIL": cytologic features, histologic correlates, and human papillomavirus detection.
Sherman ME; Tabbara SO; Scott DR; Kurman RJ; Glass AG; Manos MM; Burk RD; Rush BB; Schiffman M
Mod Pathol; 1999 Apr; 12(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 10229496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: is it worthwhile to qualify them further?
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Sehgal A; Singh V; Khan IU; Mitra AB
Indian J Cancer; 2003; 40(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 14716128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 10934951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in women over 55. Comparison with the general population and implications for management.
Rader AE; Rose PG; Rodriguez M; Mansbacher S; Pitlik D; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10349362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endocervical curettage when colposcopic examination is satisfactory and normal.
Williams DL; Dietrich C; McBroom J
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):801-3. PubMed ID: 10831970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postmenopausal Squamous Atypia: Cytologic Features, Hybrid Capture 2 Tests and Contribution to the ASCUS Pool.
McHugh KE; Reynolds JP; Suarez AA
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(5-6):418-422. PubMed ID: 30045008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
