118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1951077)
1. Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography.
Fortin DF; Spero LA; Cusma JT; Santoro L; Burgess R; Bashore TM
Am J Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 68(11):1176-82. PubMed ID: 1951077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Catheter sizes for quantitative coronary arteriography.
Reiber JH; Jukema W; van Boven A; van Houdt RM; Lie KI; Bruschke AV
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Oct; 33(2):153-5; discussion 156. PubMed ID: 7834729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography.
Wunderlich W; Roehrig B; Fischer F; Arntz HR; Agrawal R; Morguet A; Schultheiss HP; Horstkotte D
Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Aug; 14(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 9934610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calibration with currently available low-radiopacity catheters for scaling in digital quantitative coronary angiography.
Tadehara F; Imazu M; Kono S; Sano K
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):705-12. PubMed ID: 11753141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiological quality of coronary guiding catheters: a quantitative analysis.
Herrman JR; Keane D; Ozaki Y; den Boer A; Serruys PW
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Sep; 33(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8001104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of catheters and metallic catheter markers as calibration standard for measurement of coronary dimension.
Leung WH; Demopulos PA; Alderman EL; Sanders W; Stadius ML
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Nov; 21(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 2225049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative coronary arteriography using 6 and 8 French catheters with cine angiographic acquisition.
Ellis SG; Pinto IM; McGillem MJ; DeBoe SF; LeFree MT; Mancini GB
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Jan; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 1995176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative coronary arteriography: efficient correction of catheter calibrated vessel measurement.
Fischer F; Wunderlich W; Noring J; Linderer T
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():724. PubMed ID: 8591310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of 4 French catheters for quantitative coronary analysis: in vivo variability assessment using 6 French guiding catheters as reference scaling devices.
Sanmartin M; Goicolea J; Castellanos R; Bravo M; Ocaranza R; Cuevas D; Mantilla R; Ruiz-Salmeron R
J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 16(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 15152158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability in estimation of coronary dimensions from 6F and 8F catheters.
Legrand V; Raskinet B; Martinez C; Kulbertus H
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):39-45; discussion 46. PubMed ID: 8770477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW
Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Koning G; Hekking E; Kemppainen JS; Richardson GA; Rothman MT; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 11246248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of catheter size on reliability of quantitative coronary angiographic measurements (comparison of 4Fr and 6Fr catheters).
Ito S; Kinoshita K; Endo A; Nakamura M; Muramatsu T
Heart Vessels; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1752-1757. PubMed ID: 26849831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized trial comparing the benefits and limitations of 6Fr and 8Fr guiding catheters in elective coronary angioplasty: clinical, procedural, angiographic, and economic end points.
Talley JD; Mauldin PD; Becker ER
J Interv Cardiol; 1995 Aug; 8(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 10155247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of a metal ring-marked catheter for geometric calibration in quantitative coronary angiography.
Jacobs JH; Bove AA; Smith HC; Chesebro JH
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 15(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 3180205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a new system in quantitative coronary arteriography.
Svane B; Rasmundson K
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):503-7. PubMed ID: 9240667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of radiographic contrast media viscosity to flow through coronary angiographic catheters.
Roth R; Akin M; Deligonul U; Kern MJ
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 2032274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of dimensions and image quality of coronary contrast catheters from cineangiograms.
Reiber JH; Kooijman CJ; den Boer A; Serruys PW
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(5):521-31. PubMed ID: 2933154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphometry versus densitometry--a comparison by use of casts of human coronary arteries.
Doriot PA; Suilen C; Guggenheim N; Dorsaz PA; Chappuis F; Rutishauser W
Int J Card Imaging; 1992; 8(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 1629638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Precise Measurement of the Outer Diameters of Antibiotic-Laden Cement Nails Produced by Various Sized Thoracostomy Catheter Molds.
Czajka CM; Bauer IN; Warner SJ; Goytia RN; Brinker MR
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 May; 31(5):e148-e150. PubMed ID: 28169939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
