These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1951197)

  • 1. The effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on the mandibular position.
    Yamaguchi K; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Nov; 100(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 1951197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the vertical holding appliance in treatment of high-angle patients.
    Deberardinis M; Stretesky T; Sinha P; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 10842113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cephalometric evaluation of high-pull molar headgear and face-bow neck strap therapy.
    Brown P
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):621-32. PubMed ID: 281872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension.
    Ulger G; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Isik F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17045149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
    Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on brachyfacial and dolichofacial growth patterns.
    Klapper L; Navarro SF; Bowman D; Pawlowski B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 May; 101(5):425-30. PubMed ID: 1590291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise Class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force.
    Cangialosi TJ; Meistrell ME; Leung MA; Ko JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Apr; 93(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 3162641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandibular arch changes following nonextraction treatment.
    Waring DT; Pender N; Counihan D
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 Nov; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16429866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion.
    Ellis E; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 86(4):277-90. PubMed ID: 6592976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences between sliding mechanics with implant anchorage and straight-pull headgear and intermaxillary elastics in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Koyama I; Iino S; Abe Y; Takano-Yamamoto T; Miyawaki S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 21059875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear.
    Keeling SD; Wheeler TT; King GJ; Garvan CW; Cohen DA; Cabassa S; McGorray SP; Taylor MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 9457018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utilization of third molars in the orthodontic treatment of skeletal class III subjects with severe lateral deviation: case report.
    Kondo E; Ono M; Aoba TJ
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15612339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Kumari M; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20141687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Edgewise therapy with cervical and intermaxillary traction--influence on the position of the bony chin.
    Teuscher U
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jul; 53(3):212-27. PubMed ID: 6579871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uprighting the mandibular molars stimulates mandibular growth during treatment of class II malocclusion.
    Miyajima K; Yoshimoto J; Murata S; Kanomi R
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 9391711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.